Search for: "Does 1 - 21"
Results 621 - 640
of 18,509
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2012, 12:40 pm
The Federal Circuit found that nothing in the claims "limits their reach to a frame in which labels and keys are in separate slots ... claim 1's open-ended 'comprising' language on its faces does not bar other elements, (i.e., keys) from being placed in the slots. [read post]
23 Aug 2006, 5:59 am
August 21, 2006) [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 9:47 pm
[21] Rebstein, supra note 6 at 128 [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 10:47 pm
[21] Rebstein, supra note 6 at 128 [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:00 am
., Dec. 21, 2010), the U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals in a 2-1 decision held that First Amendment and RLUIPA challenges to the zoning ordinances of Northville, Michigan should be dismissed for lack of ripeness. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 5:29 am
UK divergence from the EPO on plausibility (Sandoz v BMS), Part 2: Interpretation of G 2/21Interpretation of G 2/21: Inventive step may be supported solely by post-published data (T 0116/18)G 2/21 does not permit armchair inventing (T 0258/21)Clarity on the interpretation of G2/21 from the referring Board (T 0116/18)Crystallising the interpretation of G 2/21 (T 1989/19)Plausibility in other technical fieldsA common misconception is that G… [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 6:18 am
Indeed, in Sky Österreich, C-283/11, the CJEU held that - since Article 17 allows a person to ‘own, use, dispose of and bequeath’ their possessions, in accordance with Article 1 Protocol 1 ECHR - that provision "applies to rights with an asset value creating an established legal position under the legal system, enabling the holder to exercise those rights autonomously and for his benefit. [read post]
24 Oct 2009, 6:37 am
LEXIS 2201 (October 21, 2009) [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 7:57 am
The First and Sixth Circuits have ruled that there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in such a lock and that the insertion and turning of a key therein does not constitute a search. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 9:30 pm
February 21, 2008)*: Applying these standards, we have no trouble concluding that Begin made a mistake. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 8:13 am
LEXIS 21 (February 8, 2010): We conclude that the facts of this case are closer to the facts in Pena-Flores than to those in Fuller and that, applying the factors relevant to an exigency analysis identified in the Pena-Flores-Fuller opinion, the State made a sufficient showing of exigent circumstances to uphold the search in this case. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 10:39 am
The proposed overtime rules will not go into effect on Dec. 1. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 6:57 am
See § 1.116(b)(1)–(3). [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 5:21 am
The approval of a clinical trial does therefore not, by way of a heuristic, imply an expected positive outcome of the treatment. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 6:42 pm
This is especially so where, as here, the appended signature is in a foreign language which the witness cannot read (1 Davids on New York Law of Wills, § 301). [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 6:05 am
Hoppert, 2012 PA Super 21, 2012 Pa. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:40 pm
What more does the state require?] [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
"It ruled that word "state" does not provide a commercial impression separate from the unitary term "brain state. [read post]
16 Oct 2006, 10:18 am
What does China think of the rule? [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 4:45 pm
"] From Judge Marilyn Horan's opinion Monday in Doe 1 v. [read post]
