Search for: "Does 1 - 41" Results 621 - 640 of 4,705
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2015, 8:20 pm by Donald Thompson
A person is guilty of Manslaughter in the First Degree when, with intent to cause serious physical injury to another person, he causes the death of such person (CJI2d [NY] Penal Law § 125.20[1]). [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 6:27 am by Matthew Weiss
 (This new un-posted limit, of course, does not apply to NYC highways which have a default speed of 50 mph). [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 12:41 pm by Giles Peaker
But while not meeting that requirement may give rise to a criminal prosecution, it does not invalidate a s.21 notice for a pre 1 October 2015 tenancy. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 11:52 pm by Michael Cannan
Across the nation, however, the average rate increase after an at-fault accident hovers around 41 percent. [read post]
18 Sep 2024, 11:31 am by Eugene Volokh
See, e.g., MIT, 46 F.4th at 66 (1st Cir); Pilcher, 950 F.3d at 41-42 (2d Cir.); Megless, 654 F.3d at 407 (3d Cir.); Doe v. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 2:40 am by Krzysztof Pacula
’   Court’s findings At the outset, the Courts affirms that the notion of ‘judgment’ within the meaning of Article 2(4) of the Brussels II Regulation has to be given an autonomous meaning (para. 41). [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 1:35 pm by Dennis Crouch
In ordering dismissal, Judge Davis wrote: “Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), all claims … are dismissed with prejudice. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 1:48 pm by Kevin Kaufman
Nevada taxes wage income at a low rate under the state’s Modified Business Tax but does not tax investment income. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 4:11 pm by Steven Boutwell
On April 2, 2020, Louisiana’s Governor in Proclamation JBE 2020-41 suspended all legal deadlines at least until April 30, 2020. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 8:06 am by Rosalind English
 Department of Health [2017] UKSC 41, 14 June 2017 – judgment here; previous post here. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 8:49 am by Lindsey A. Zahn
The Court of Appeals reviewed s 41(1)(f) and determined that the analysis entailed a two-step approach. [read post]