Search for: "Does 1-10,inclusive" Results 621 - 640 of 2,239
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2020, 9:38 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
It is important to bear in mind that this second award was regarding the subject-matter which was inclusive of the first award. [read post]
26 May 2020, 11:25 am by Elliot Setzer
The ICAP Staff Attorney 1 will be supervised by ICAP's Executive Director and Legal Director. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 4:42 am by David DePaolo
(l) Upon notice from the administrative director that an independent review organization has been assigned, the employer shall provide to the independent medical review organization all of the following documents within 10 days of notice of assignment: (1) A copy of all of the employee's medical records in the possession of the employer or under the control of the employer relevant to each of the following: (A) The employee's current medical condition. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 9:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Nat’l Jeweler Magazine, Inc. , No. 06 Civ. 662 (GBD), 2006 WL 2254818, at *10 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 7:08 am by Tian Lu
The scope of protection under trade mark law is therefore not determined by a term’s inclusion in a taxonomic information structure but by the usual meaning of that term. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 9:50 am by Eric Goldman
June 10, 2014) (holding that an online service provider “may not invoke the safe harbor found in Section 512(c)(1) with respect to infringing conduct that occurred prior to . . . designating a DMCA-related agent with the Copyright Office”); Perfect 10, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm by Kevin Kaufman
Figure 1 Top Effective Marginal Tax Rates in 2019 and Their Composition Table 1. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 4:59 pm by Eugene Volokh
Forced inclusion of straight athletes would distract from and diminish those efforts. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 9:37 am by Venkat
You'd be hard pressed to find a paper.li with over 10 subscribers. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 6:55 am by Kevin Russell
Matt Matson - Dave LeRoy’s first three points are: 1. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:51 am by INFORRM
The Defence disputed the Claimants’ entitlement to bring representative proceedings under CPR 19.6 and asserted an unqualified right to free expression under Article 10(1). [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
Accordingly, because the Final Order does not actually mandate that television service providers distribute a channel that broadcasts the Super Bowl, but instead simply imposes a condition on those that already do, its issuance was not authorized by s. 9(1) (h) of the Broadcasting Act. [read post]
16 Aug 2014, 12:15 pm by Guest Blogger
  I don’t care who does it, whether it’s some court some place, or the United States Congress. [read post]