Search for: "Does 1-27"
Results 621 - 640
of 11,129
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2011, 10:34 am
Illinois Pollution Control Board, No. 110882 -- (1) Does a petitioner in an individual adjusted standard proceeding before the Illinois Pollution Control Board have a burden of proof with respect to the standards set forth in Section 27(a) of the Illinois Environmental Protection Act? [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:14 pm
On May 27, 2016, Geico Marine sent Shackleford an email confirming that it had removed the Port Risk Ashore restriction. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 12:03 pm
1. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 1:29 pm
Why Does a Company Need to Be Reviewed Before It’s Formed? [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 4:49 am
Practically speaking, three primary scenarios will arise:1. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 12:52 am
These claims are framed under sections 27(1), 27(2), and 27(2.3) of Canada’s Copyright Act respectively. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 11:34 am
Becerra 16-1153 Issues: (1) Whether the U.S. [read post]
30 May 2008, 12:42 am
_uacct = "UA-1069395-1"; urchinTracker(); [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 6:27 am
Recording a license agreement concerning an EU trade mark is not mandatory but has several benefits (see the EUIPO’s trade mark Guidelines): The license has effects vis-à-vis third parties (Art. 27(1) EUTMR). [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 2:25 pm
Leuthold does not refer to this authority and instead relies on paragraph 2.4(1)(c) of the Copyright Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 7:39 am
What does it mean for water supply? [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 5:28 am
The Campus Police declined to bring criminal charges against Doe, but forwarded the written incident report to the University of Maryland Office of Civil Rights and Sexual Misconduct (OCRSM) on January 27, 2015. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:43 am
[Continued from yesterday's Part 3 and the preceding Part 1 and Part 2.] [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 2:45 am
The first examiner indicated that in his opinion claim 1 now on file suffers from the same deficiency as claim 1 as originally filed. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 6:36 am
On 4 October 2018 the opponent in the opposition proceedings against European patent EP 1286037 filed an appeal against the decision of the opposition division, dated 27 July 2018, not to continue the opposition proceedings in accordance with Rule 84(1) EPC. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 8:38 am
But a court decision allowing pseudonymity on these grounds sends a clear message: The legal system does not approve of the community's attitudes. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
He does not report having a savings account. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 6:46 am
Does 1-41, W.D. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 6:47 pm
Gilead Sciences, Inc., Rader, CJ Op. at *1. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 11:08 pm
. 'With regard to the conditions that the disclaimer meets the requirements of clarity and conciseness and does not remove more than necessary to restore novelty, both explicitly indicated in G 1/03 (see headnote, points 2.2 and 2.4), the Board concurs with the positions expressed in T 2130/11, points 2.9 and 2.10*. [read post]
