Search for: "Edwards v. Super*" Results 621 - 640 of 1,065
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013)In 2010, the faculty at Penn State Law approved the creation of a new concept course, to be named "Elements of Law". [read post]
30 May 2014, 6:31 am by John Elwood
North Carolina, 13-633; Edwards v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 1:40 pm by Bexis
Wright, et al (June 7, 2013)(unpublished) and Blake v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 9:19 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Representing Harvey Levin, a fired state employee claiming age bias, will be Chicago attorney Edward R. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:00 pm by Howard Gutman
Expert Testimony Edward Clayton, (Clayton), testified on behalf of Pascarella, as an expert auto mechanic. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) (Out-Law) ECJ rules German music distributor cannot sell two Bob Dylan compilation albums because Sony owns rights to songs in question: Sony Music Entertainment (Germany) GmbH v Falcon Neue Medien Vertrieb GmbH (IPKat) (Law360) ECJ: Date set for Advocate General’s opinion in L'Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie SNC, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie v Bellure NV, Malaika… [read post]
22 May 2011, 5:01 pm by INFORRM
We had a case comment on this blog by Edward Craven and a piece by Tim Lowles. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 9:20 am
That representation was the basis for a 1992 book O’Donnell co-authored called “Fatal Subtraction: The Inside Story of Buchwald v. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 2:34 am
But where electability tracks affirmatively bad reasons, we might worry about the Palmore v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 6:07 am by Amy Howe
” [Disclosure:  Goldstein & Russell, P.C., represents the petitioners in Kirby v. [read post]