Search for: "England v. Cir*"
Results 621 - 640
of 2,616
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2020, 12:10 pm
The justices in the Court of Appeals of Maryland admitted it is unpopular but declined to change it in the 2013 hearing of Coleman v. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 3:36 pm
Bucklew, (citing 4 William Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England 370 (1769); Stuart Banner, The Death Penalty: An American History 76 (2002); Baze v. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 7:03 am
It will also consider whether England is the proper forum to make a determination of FRAND terms by reference to a global portfolio of SEPs. [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 5:57 am
’ Tony Porter, the Surveillance Camera Commissioner for England and Wales (SCC), has stepped in to the fight, by calling for Government inspections into police use of FRT and for the introduction of a ‘very clear oversight mechanism. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 4:40 pm
The Court of Appeal gave guidance on the operation of the section 4 defence in Serafin v Malkiewicz & Ors [2019] EWCA Civ 852. [read post]
Defamation Act 2013: A summary and overview six years on, Part 1, Sections 1 to 3 – Brett Wilson LLP
28 Jan 2020, 4:39 pm
The Act stipulated that the courts of England and Wales do not have jurisdiction to hear defamation actions against persons domiciled outside the UK, EU or Lugano Convention, unless satisfied that this is clearly the most appropriate place to bring the action (with a view to preventing so-called ‘libel tourism’). [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
As Roncarelli v. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 3:02 am
” [Daniel Fisher, Legal NewsLine] “Without evidence and unable to make public nuisance argument, Delaware’s opioid claims against Walgreens fail” [same] “Oklahoma Opioid Ruling: Another Instance of Improper Judicial Governance Through Public Nuisance Litigation” [Eric Lasker and Jessica Lu, Washington Legal Foundation, earlier] “Merck v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 6:00 am
Key Findings: The American nicotine market is developing faster than ever due to introduction of non-combustible recreational nicotine products. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 5:06 am
In Lujan v. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 9:54 am
| Around the IP Blogs | TuneIn to the sound of communication to the public (Part 2) | TuneIn to the sound of communication to the public (Part 1) | Book Review: A Practitioner's Guide to European Patent Law by Paul England | [Guest Post] Remember the case of Ai Weiwei v Volkswagen? [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 11:29 pm
The impact of Huawei v ZTE Since the seminal 2015 CJEU case of Huawei v ZTE (the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) (Case C-170/13 Huawei Technologies, EU:C:2015:477)) the importance of a harmonised approach to FRAND across EU member states has become obvious. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 7:26 pm
New England Teamsters & Trucking Indus. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 5:08 am
Wheaton v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 12:08 pm
Southern New England Telephone Co. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 4:28 am
The case is still on going and the most recent hearing before Mr Justice Nugee took place on the 9th December 2019 in the High Court of England and Wales.Recap of the caseEd Sheeran's song 'Shape of you' reached number-one on the singles charts in 34 countries, was the best-selling-song of 2017, the best-selling digital song worldwide, winning multiply awards and ranked as the ninth most successful song of all-time by Billboard. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 8:29 am
Additional Resources: Ridgeway v. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 3:11 am
An example is Richman v Ben-Tovim 2007 (2) SA 203 where the respondent did not dispute the debt but argued that his mere presence in England was an insufficient basis for the English court to exercise jurisdiction. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm
He gave Article 23 DPD a very narrow reading, contrary to CJEU decisions such as Case C–168/00 Leitner v TUI Deutschland GmbH [2002] ECR I–1631 (ECLI:EU:C:2002:163; ECJ, 12 March 2002), which held that compensation for “damage” must include both material and non-material damage, that is, both actual damage and distress (see also Case C-63/09 Walz v Clickair SA [2010] ECR I 4239 (ECLI:EU:C:2010:251; CJEU, 6 May 2010); Case… [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 10:17 am
Requirements to be met by the claimant and pre-action correspondence In the aftermath of the VW-Porsche takeover battle, an investor based on the Cayman Islands announced to sue Porsche SE in the High Court of England and Wales. [read post]
