Search for: "Englander v. State" Results 621 - 640 of 4,116
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2020, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
”  However, the facts of the CJEU case cited in support of this proposition, Marinari v Lloyds Bank (1995), concerned a series of events which took place in Manchester, culminating in the claimant’s arrest by the police in England, ver [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 9:05 am by Florian Mueller
The next court to look at this will presumably the United States District for the Southern District of Florida at next year's Motorola v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 9:01 pm by Saira Mohamed
The United States Supreme Court already has turned to foreign and international law in its decisions on the death penalty; in the majority opinion in Roper v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 9:30 am by Karen Tani
Via Al Brophy at the Faculty Lounge, we have word of a recently published essay by John V. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 5:53 pm
The United States Supreme Court ruled on the issue in Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The committee has included an understanding in the resolution of advice and consent that addresses this point (see section V below). [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:40 am by Rosalind English
Andrew Crosbie v Secretary of State for Defence [2011] EWHC 879 (Admin) – Read judgment The Administrative Court has ruled that the employment of an army chaplain involves a “a special bond of trust and loyalty” between employee and state such that the full panoply of fair trial rights under Article 6 could not apply. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 12:46 am
The Court of Appeal has in Youell v La Reunion [2009] EWCA Civ 175 confirmed that, in light of the important West Tankers decision of the European Court of Justice, (see here) the arbitration exclusion to the Brussels I Regulation will be narrowly applied by the English courts. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:58 am
324/09 L’Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie, L’Oréal (UK) Limited v eBay International AG, eBay Europe SARL and eBay (UK) Limited. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 3:45 am by INFORRM
In England and Wales, section 9 of the Defamation Act 2013 provides that a court does not have jurisdiction to hear an action against a person not domiciled in the UK, EU or a Lugano Convention state “unless the court is satisfied that, of all the places in which the statement complained of has been published, England and Wales is clearly the most appropriate place in which to bring an action in respect of the statement”. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 1:15 pm
So California generally does what England does.But here's the thing. [read post]