Search for: "English v. State"
Results 621 - 640
of 6,401
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am
On appeal to the supreme court of the state, the judgment was affirmed [. . .].'” 1921—Kirby v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 2:07 am
Case reference: Duncombe & Others v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families (No. 2) Tagged: Jurisdiction [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 12:12 pm
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Knox v. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 10:29 am
A glaring example is the highly debated and publicized case of Owens v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 6:31 am
In Hrvatska Elektroprivreda v Slovenia [ICSID Case No ARB/05/24 (6 May 2008)] the defendant, in an arbitration before the International Centre for the Settlement of Investments Disputes (ICSID) waited until one week before a substantive hearing, to disclose to the tribunal and the claimant, a list of lawyers who would be attending. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:30 am
In Wayfair v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 9:32 am
S. 420, 425, 427 (1984) (quoting United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 10:31 am
United States, 290 U.S. 13 (1933) (allowing a property owner to directly bring a Fifth Amendment claim for compensation upon the taking of the property, without pursuing, for example, the state-litigation requirement as contemplated in Williamson County)[13]; First English Evangelical Lutheran Church of Glendale v. [read post]
23 Sep 2012, 10:24 am
However in states with a diverse population such as California, English may not be appropriate. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 5:00 am
Palomoares v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 5:29 pm
Secondly, there is a point concerning the position in the United States. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 11:51 am
United States, the case on the scope of double jeopardy. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 8:18 am
What is the English Court's solution to this conundrum? [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 12:57 pm
ICC (1990), and First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 10:40 am
In such cases, the principle has been accepted that an English court might be obliged to refuse to co-operate with a non-contracting state if to do so would be a “flagrant breach of Article 6”. [read post]
24 Dec 2007, 4:44 am
" Specifically, the article stated that plaintiff told students that they had to pay $5 for workbooks. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:58 am
Argentum Exploration Limited v The Silver (All Persons Claiming to be Interested in and/or have Rights in Respect of, the Silver) v Secretary of State for Transport, The Receiver of Wreck [2022] EWCA Civ 1318 [read post]
13 May 2016, 4:27 pm
The court stated that, on the facts outlined above, the “basic elements of a good, strong harassment claim [in English law] are present“. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 7:46 am
" New York Times v. [read post]
