Search for: "Ex parte B. J. S." Results 621 - 640 of 803
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2020, 10:24 am by Simon Lester
And while there is some disagreement about the exact effects that DSB decisions have on non-disputants,[xii] it is safe to say that these decisions, by virtue of DSB-sanction, become part of WTO’s ‘acquis’. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 12:16 am by JR Chaves
Por una parte, los alumnos con más capacidades no desarrollan todo su potencial y, por otra parte, los que tienen una menor curiosidad natural por aprender no avanzan. [read post]
18 May 2021, 5:01 am by George Croner
Substantively, in terms of the categories of foreign intelligence information sought by the government, the certifications have not changed materially since Section 702 was first enacted as part of the FISA Amendments Act of 2008. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am by Dr. Jillian T. Weiss
" Part of the problem also appears to be that, according to the District Court, the EEOC's complaint was not properly pled, indicating perhaps some lack of expertise by the attorneys in charge.The court determined that this failure deprived the employer of the opportunity to settle the complaint. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 1:17 am by Kelly
Cologne – Gathering evidence in IP matters: The disputed ‘urgency’ requirement of /ex parte /inspection orders (EPLAW) Appeal Court Frankfurt:  Presumption of urgency under unfair completion law: Whiskey-Cola (EPLAW) Was no copyright the real reason behind Germany’s industrial expansion? [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
The FDA’s actions led the drug companies voluntarily to withdraw PPA-containing products. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 6:29 am by Jacques Singer-Emery
Circuit’s decision In re Kempthorne, 449 F.3d 1265 (D.C. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  At a board meeting on September 13, 2023, respondent rescinded its previous resolution and voted, 6-2, to deny petitioner Marchitell’s appeal (the “September vote”).[1]  As a result, the challenged books remained in respondent’s collection. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  At a board meeting on September 13, 2023, respondent rescinded its previous resolution and voted, 6-2, to deny petitioner Marchitell’s appeal (the “September vote”).[1]  As a result, the challenged books remained in respondent’s collection. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 8:30 pm by Douglas
Bônus: Outras organizações misteriosas ligadas aos maçons povoam o imaginário popular. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 8:30 pm by Douglas
Bônus: Outras organizações misteriosas ligadas aos maçons povoam o imaginário popular. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 11:47 am by Giles Peaker
Of these, the following were not part of conducting litigation in themselves. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
An organization has “associational” standing to bring claims on behalf of its members if “(a) its members would otherwise have standing to sue in their own right; (b) the interests it seeks to protect are germane to the organization’s purpose; and (c) neither [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Other authorities similarly summarize the three-part test as involving inclination, opportunity, and intent. [read post]