Search for: "Failing v. Failing" Results 621 - 640 of 98,686
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2010, 7:28 am by INFORRM
  In substance, it decided that the claim to privilege failed because the steps taken to verify were inadequate. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 10:56 am
Police officer terminated after failing to report the loss of evidenceBonifacio v Safir, App. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 2:00 pm by Unreported Opinions
The recipients failed to repay the loans and Zhang ... [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:03 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Although the petitioner failed to offer a reasonable excuse for his failure to timely serve the notice of claim, "the absence of a reasonable excuse is not fatal to the petition where there was actual notice and absence of prejudice" (Matter of Regan v City of New York, 131 AD3d at 1066; see Matter of Brownstein v Incorporated Vil. of Hempstead, 52 AD3d 507, 510; Gibbs v City of New York, 22 AD3d 717, 720; cf. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:03 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Although the petitioner failed to offer a reasonable excuse for his failure to timely serve the notice of claim, "the absence of a reasonable excuse is not fatal to the petition where there was actual notice and absence of prejudice" (Matter of Regan v City of New York, 131 AD3d at 1066; see Matter of Brownstein v Incorporated Vil. of Hempstead, 52 AD3d 507, 510; Gibbs v City of New York, 22 AD3d 717, 720; cf. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 3:12 am
Police officers claim they were subjected to punishment after failing to meet their "traffic ticket quotas" Matarazzo v NYC Police Dept., 261 AD2d 142Section 215-a of the State Labor Law makes it unlawful to penalize an individual who fails to meet any quota related to the issuance of tickets or summonses written within a specified period of time for traffic violations. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:00 am
The Rule provided that no provisional employee who twice failed the test for the position would be given another provisional appointment unless the test failed to produce any qualified eligible or where the list was immediately exhausted. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 5:42 pm by Patricia Salkin
Attard v Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, 2017 WL 3711765 (CA App. 8/29/2017)Filed under: Equitable Estoppel, Vested Rights [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 9:27 am by Eric Goldman
Twitter * “Material Support for Terrorism” Lawsuit Fails a Third Time–Colon v. [read post]