Search for: "Fails v. Virginia State Bar"
Results 621 - 640
of 774
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2011, 2:59 am
A decision issued this month by the Supreme Court of Virginia, Kaltman v All American Pest, answers a question often debated by Virginia lawyers regarding the economic loss rule. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 5:22 am
Solutions Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 4:49 pm
That maneuver failed. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 9:01 pm
In a 2006 decision in Central Virginia Community College v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 3:54 am
It was in the case of Virginia v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 5:26 pm
There is a basic difference between direct state interference with a protected activity and state encouragement of an alternative activity consonant with legislative policy.This body of jurisprudence opens the door for programs like the one being pilot tested in West Virginia that I blogged on last week over at the Health Law Prof Blog. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 8:40 am
More on Atkins v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 8:58 am
The common reference point is Virginia v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 3:32 am
But you can't sue the state for failing you. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 9:38 am
Virginia, 443 U. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 6:47 pm
State, 959 So. 2d 702 (Fla. 2007), and Nixon v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:59 am
The Supreme Court has held (in Lamont v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm
Health Care Reform: VIRGINIA FEDERAL JUDGE DERAILS PART OF HEALTH CARE REFORM LAW, Commonwealth v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 12:13 pm
Meanwhile, an electric utility’s appeal of a trial court ruling that the Village of Kivalina failed to allege an “occurrence” is due to be argued before the Virginia Supreme Court in early 2011 in AES Corp. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 9:58 pm
") Proceedings of the Bar and Officers of the Supreme Court of the United States in Memory of Benjamin Nathan Cardozo, November 26, 1938 (full text via the HathiTrust Digital Library) George S. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am
Kappos (IP Spotlight) (Patent Docs) Sham patent reexamination action not available in State Court says CAFC: Lockwood v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 2:30 am
In White v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 1:03 pm
In Philip Abi-Najm, et. al, v Concord Condominium, LLC, several condominium purchasers sued Concord under for breach of contract, breach of the Virginia Consumer Protection Act (VCPA) and for fraud in the inducement based upon flooring that Concord installed that was far from the quality stated in the purchase contract. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 2:46 pm
In McKelvy v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:29 am
None of the accusations in the lawsuit had been even minimally investigated before filing as required by the rules of lawyer conduct and Virginia state law, the judge stated in his opinion. [read post]
