Search for: "Federal Employment Law Insider" Results 621 - 640 of 2,468
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2020, 7:48 am by Amy Howe
EEOC, the Supreme Court recognized a “ministerial exception” to employment discrimination laws, reflecting the idea that religious institutions normally have the sole right to determine who can act as their ministers. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 8:57 am by Dan Harris and Fred Rocafort
  As you mentioned, the written law and the realities (especially in China) can be very different. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 5:21 am by Joseph J. Lazzarotti
However, employers should consider how these laws may be interpreted and shape their approach accordingly. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 6:00 am by Andrew Hamm
Winfield 19-899Issue: Whether an officer who has consent to “get inside” a house but instead destroys it from the outside is entitled to qualified immunity in the absence of precisely factually on-point case law. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 4:55 am by Hedge Fund Lawyer
However, such would-be networks generally cannot freely distribute their tokens to potential users due to existing federal and/or state securities laws. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
David Perdue Bought Stock in a Company That Produces Protective Medical Equipment the Same Day Senators Received a Classified Briefing on the Coronavirus Business Insider – Sonam Sheth | Published: 4/7/2020 U.S. [read post]
These requirements are consistent with the guidance provided by the EEOC in its March 27, 2020 webinar, which addressed permissible actions employers may take during the COVID-19 pandemic while still remaining compliant with federal antidiscrimination laws. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 4:14 pm by John Jascob
The court ruled that the company violated the registration provisions of the federal securities law with the sale of those tokens to U.S. persons. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 1:50 pm by Kevin LaCroix
 A version of this article will be published in a forthcoming issue of the Wiley law firm’s Executive Summary blog. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
It matters even more under Massachusetts law, which provides greater protection to employees than does federal law.Let’s consider liability for sexual harassment under federal law first.In the Supreme Court’s first harassment case, Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
According to a Business Insider report, companies are on track to spend $15 billion on influencer marketing by 2022, up from as much as $8 billion in 2019. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 12:30 pm by John Ross
That is, he intended to kill the officer in order to prevent information from being conveyed to federal law enforcement. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:00 pm by Joe
This act codified all existing federal tax laws and contained 300 provisions. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 6:36 am by Laura Kim and Jadzia Pierce
Cardi B might like it, but the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) did not. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 3:19 pm by Bianca Saad
Bianca Saad, Employment Law Subject Matter Expert, CalChamber For more COVID-19-related federal, state and local resources, including CalChamber coverage, visit the CalChamber Coronavirus (COVID-19) webpage. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 11:17 am by Sami Azhari
Such an arrest is a violation of constitutional rights under various U.S. federal and Illinois state laws. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 2:06 pm by Olivia Cross
“We prefer to not answer external questions at this time due to federal securities law that limits what information a company can release to the public. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 10:32 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
Additionally, the state’s law allows injured victims to also bring suit against the negligent driver’s employer, if the driver was acting in the scope of his employment when the accident occured. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 9:19 am by HRWatchdog
CalChamber’s California experts know the state’s employment laws inside and out. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 11:30 am by Christopher Tyner
In narrow circumstances, the common law defense of justification may be an affirmative defense to a charge of possession of a firearm by a felon under G.S. 14-415.1 State v. [read post]