Search for: "Fee v. Fee"
Results 621 - 640
of 31,270
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2020, 5:17 pm
” Drone Nerds Franchising Llc v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 7:09 am
In light of Highmark Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 5:00 am
Citing Matter of Cook v Nassau County Police Dept., 140 AD3d 1059, the Appellate Division noted that the State Legislature, "[in] order to create a clear deterrent to unreasonable delays and denials of access [and thereby] encourage every unit of government to make a good faith effort to comply with the requirements of FOIL", provided for the assessment of an attorney's fee and other litigation costs in FOIL proceedings. [read post]
5 May 2022, 5:00 am
Citing Matter of Cook v Nassau County Police Dept., 140 AD3d 1059, the Appellate Division noted that the State Legislature, "[in] order to create a clear deterrent to unreasonable delays and denials of access [and thereby] encourage every unit of government to make a good faith effort to comply with the requirements of FOIL", provided for the assessment of an attorney's fee and other litigation costs in FOIL proceedings. [read post]
5 May 2022, 5:00 am
Citing Matter of Cook v Nassau County Police Dept., 140 AD3d 1059, the Appellate Division noted that the State Legislature, "[in] order to create a clear deterrent to unreasonable delays and denials of access [and thereby] encourage every unit of government to make a good faith effort to comply with the requirements of FOIL", provided for the assessment of an attorney's fee and other litigation costs in FOIL proceedings. [read post]
5 May 2022, 5:00 am
Citing Matter of Cook v Nassau County Police Dept., 140 AD3d 1059, the Appellate Division noted that the State Legislature, "[in] order to create a clear deterrent to unreasonable delays and denials of access [and thereby] encourage every unit of government to make a good faith effort to comply with the requirements of FOIL", provided for the assessment of an attorney's fee and other litigation costs in FOIL proceedings. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 5:00 pm
As was discussed in an earlier post (here) the Delaware Supreme Court recently upheld a fee shifting bylaw adopted by a non-stock corporation in ATP Tour v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 9:32 am
The February 1, 2012 Supreme Court decision Chisholm v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 5:48 am
In Lowery v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 2:38 pm
” The Court also pointed to its recent ruling in Amneal Pharmaceuticals v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 12:53 pm
In today’s case (Wilhelmson v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 2:31 am
Find the opinion in Olsen v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 9:28 am
See Kingsdorf v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 2:08 pm
Let’s talk about Friedrichs v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 9:26 am
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Unpublished Opinion in the following matter: DA 08-0635, 2009 MT 259N, IN RE THE MATTER OF RICHARD RENN’S ATTORNEY FEES, ERENE BRIESE, Petitioner and Appellee, v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 1:38 pm
In EEOC v. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 3:48 am
Widow asks for referral fee on the $ 875,000 settlement. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 6:57 am
Okla.): 57-1 Motion for Attorney Fees 60 Response 61 Reply 81 DCT Order Prior post here. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 2:09 pm
The 8th Circuit, in Gallus v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 8:14 am
Solo NY attorney represented California client in Oregon courts is permitted to sue for legal fees here in NY. [read post]
