Search for: "Feldman v. State" Results 621 - 640 of 848
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2012, 6:37 am by Lawrence Solum
In this paper, I examine carefully the background to MacPherson v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Levinnstim v Parker, 27 AD3d 698; see also Molina v State of New York, 46 AD3d 642; Williams v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 10 AD3d 653). [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 9:37 am
Hutin YJF, Pool V, Cramer EH, et al. (1999). [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 6:58 am by Marissa Miller
” Justice Ginsburg argued that the Justices should have delayed hearing such cases while the state-by-state process evolved, or alternatively, should have struck down just the Texas law without declaring a right to privacy that legalized the procedure nationwide The ABA Journal’s Jill Schachner Chanen discusses the film The Loving Story, a documentary on the couple behind the Court’s landmark decision in Loving v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 6:45 am by Kiran Bhat
At this blog, Scott Dodson previews arguments in Wood v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:10 pm
Supreme Court case about the presidential war power, Youngstown Sheet & Tube v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 8:20 pm by Mary L. Dudziak
  The most iconic case about presidential war power, Youngstown Sheet & Tube v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 8:15 am by Dennis Crouch
The excerpt is reproduced with permission from Harvard and Professor Feldman. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 1:59 am
 Their estimate is based on a 2007 CDC FoodNet survey that found ~3% of people surveyed in 10 states reported drinking raw milk in the last 7 days (25). [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 10:30 am by Ashby Jones
” In other words, the court seems to understand the magnitude of the case — easily the most high-profile since Bush v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:19 am by David Lat
Opponents of the Act argue that this is like United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 6:23 am by Joshua Matz
United States, in which the state seeks review of a Ninth Circuit decision blocking the enforcement of key provisions of Arizona’s immigration law. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:50 am by Eoin Daly
Thish was evident in the Byrne v Minister for Finance case, where the Supreme Court eschewed any excessively literalist approach to the existing article 35.5, privileging the purpose and value of the literal rule. [read post]