Search for: "Files v. State" Results 621 - 640 of 91,466
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2024, 1:42 pm by H&A Newscaster
Trunk Archive also filed a motion for summary judgment on liability under both theories. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 11:26 am by centerforartlaw
However upon filing for a registration with the Copyright Office, the actor received a letter from the office denying his registration. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 7:01 am by Mayberry Law Firm
Florida, like all states, must adhere to these federal guidelines but also interprets Miranda issues through its state courts. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 5:13 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The court properly dismissed plaintiff’s claim pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) because he failed to state a cause of action (Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87 [1994]). [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
United States (9th Cir. 1989) (no right of access to ex parte warrant application before indictment); States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 4:51 am by Peter A. Mahler
Konick appeared pro se and, according to the opinion, “filed a barrage of motions” all of which were denied. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 12:07 am by Thorsten Bausch (Hoffmann Eitle)
In the following I will focus on Decision CC_586764/2023 (UPC_14/2023), which is the counterclaim for revocation in the infringement action between Amgen Inc and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. that Amgen filed on the very first day when the UPC opened its doors (1 June 2023), a few minutes after Sanofi (Regeneron’s licensee) had filed a revocation action at the Central Division, which became the UPC’s very first case ever (UPC_1/2023). [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 9:06 pm by Dru Stevenson
” The defendants filed motions to dismiss, which the district court denied. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Choi at University of Michigan Law School, and Geeyoung Min at Michigan State University College of Law. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
” On 2 July 2024, some arrived with placards stating: “Jurors have an absolute right to acquit a defendant according to their conscience. [read post]