Search for: "Fisher v. Rule"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,436
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2014, 6:25 am
Although Jeff Fisher, an experienced Supreme Court litigator, has presented some formidable arguments to rule for Heien, he may face an uphill battle persuading a majority of Justices that a reasonable, but mistaken, interpretation of state law should receive different constitutional treatment. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 7:47 am
As both government briefs quickly note, in Michigan v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 6:26 am
Stahler made unsuitable recommendations to customers in violation of FINRA Rule 2310 and 2110 and FINRA Rule 2010. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 12:54 am
Fisher, ––– U.S. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 7:13 am
As counsel for Velocys accepted, Velocys would not be able to make such amendments in the context of EPO opposition proceedings by virtue of Rule 80 of the EPC Implementing Regulations: see T 993/07 Fisher-Rosemount/Field device management system(unreported, 20 May 2010) cited in Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office (7th edition) at p. 899. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court ruling establishing this privilege in 1953, U.S. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 7:04 am
* In Cold Comfort Farmers Cards: Californians feel New Zealand chill, Katfriend Ken Moon (AJPark) writes about ruling of the New Zealand Court of Appeal in a software copyright and trade secrets dispute, Karum Group LLC v Fisher & Paykel Finance [2014] NZCA 389. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 11:14 am
The majority concluded that, under Feiner v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 12:30 am
From Katfriend and long-time respected IP commentator Ken Moon (AJPark) comes news of a 13 August ruling of the New Zealand Court of Appeal (Harrison and Miller JJ) in a software copyright and trade secrets dispute, Karum Group LLC v Fisher & Paykel Finance [2014] NZCA 389, which was heard this June. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 9:26 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 6:00 am
In its recent decision in the case of Seiple v. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 1:01 pm
A: Reliable enough.United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 6:05 am
” As Lyle reported for this blog earlier in the week, Abigail Fisher has asked the full U.S. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 11:29 am
The US Supreme Court [official website] had remanded the case [JURIST report], Fisher v. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 7:13 am
” Fisher v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 11:58 pm
In its important 7-1 ruling in Fisher v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 3:25 pm
Fisher’s lawyers had taken her constitutional challenge to the Supreme Court, arguing that the university had not justified the race-conscious part of its admissions plan that it adopted in the wake of the 2003 decision by the Justices in a University of Michigan Law School case (Grutter v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 10:13 am
UMG Recordings, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 5:05 am
The Commonwealth also filed a motion to report a question of law to the Appeals Court prior to trial pursuant to Massachusetts Rules of Criminal Procedure Rule 34. . . . [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 6:30 am
In Burwell v. [read post]
