Search for: "Foote v. Grant"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,643
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2009, 10:25 am
Given the specific facts of the Kaminskas v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 4:08 pm
The case will decide whether the Court of Appeal erred in overturning the City’s approval of the Kapors’ two-story, 6,478 square foot single family residence, and 3,394 square foot garage, on a 29,714 square foot parcel zoned Single Family Residential District–Hillside Overlay. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 4:08 pm
The case will decide whether the Court of Appeal erred in overturning the City’s approval of the Kapors’ two-story, 6,478 square foot single family residence, and 3,394 square foot garage, on a 29,714 square foot parcel zoned Single Family Residential District–Hillside Overlay. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:53 am
V. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:53 am
V. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 8:56 pm
Due to the way that costs are assessed and recovered, even the winner often has to foot the bill for some their own lawyers’ fees. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 10:37 am
Our proposed new provision (outlined in paragraph 56) would put the High Court of Justiciary on an equal footing with its counterparts elsewhere in the UK by enabling the Supreme Court to grant permission to appeal only if the High Court of Justiciary has granted a certificate that the case raises a point of general public importance. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 8:30 am
Regan v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 1:57 pm
The May 2, 2018 Court of Appeals opinion of Clark v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 11:07 pm
") have been requiring him to remove his shoes before being granted access to the building. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 8:09 pm
Kulick’s, Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 1:00 pm
The Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) today issued a decision in Regis College v. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 9:00 pm
Tired of all the COVID restrictions, Texas finally put its foot down. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 8:49 am
Paper v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 3:45 am
The landmark Supreme Court case of Obergefell v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 7:37 am
That a simplified version of the P&I Clause but the point is that it ensures "the citizens of the United States [are] one people, by placing the citizens of each State upon the same footing with citizens of other States," even if people in those other states elect someone that we despise to the White House.The case is Clement v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 6:30 am
The second you step foot into the parking lot at an auto dealership, a salesman will come-a-running in the hopes that you buy a car that will grant him a commission so he can feed his family. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 11:12 am
Knight v. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 11:12 am
Knight v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 3:07 pm
But five justices had rejected that theory in Williams v. [read post]
