Search for: "Ford Motor Company" Results 621 - 640 of 2,014
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2016, 7:00 am by Jon Gelman
Department of Transportation's National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety announced today a historic commitment by 20 automakers representing more than 99 percent of the U.S. auto market to make automatic emergency braking a standard feature on virtually all new cars no later than NHTSA's 2022 reporting year, which begins Sept. 1, 2022.Automakers making the commitment are Audi, BMW, FCA US LLC, Ford, General Motors,… [read post]
12 Mar 2016, 1:00 am by Taras Rudnitsky
He has handled cases against General Motors (GM), Ford, Chrysler, Toyota, Mitsubishi and other car companies and car dealers. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 11:03 am by Dean Freeman
More than two dozen companies are investing millions into development of the technology, including Google, Apple, Tesla, General Motors, Ford, Mercedes-Benz and Delphi Automotive. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 6:01 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
According to a recent news article from CBS, Ford Motor Company is recalling approximately 391,000 Ford Ranger pickups manufactured between the years 2004 and 2006 after man died as a result on an airbag explosion. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 6:00 am by Michael O'Connor & Associates, LLC
Other automakers involved in the new Takata inflator recalls include Mazda Motor Corp., Honda, BMW, Ford Ranger, Daimler AG’s Mercedes-Benz and Sprinter van brands and Saab AB. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
  The Second Circuit held – in the context of asbestos mass tort litigation – that a company with “continuous and systematic” business in a state (Connecticut) can’t be sued by out-of-state litigation tourist plaintiffs over out-of-state asbestos exposure. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 10:27 am by Jim Caton
Information has come out that Ford Motor Company continued to use asbestos-lined brakes for twenty years after internal memos expressed concern for theThe post Ford Pays $40 Million for Its Own Asbestos Science appeared first on Legal Reader. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 2:11 pm by Goldfinger Personal Injury Law
We see that Google, Apple, Microsoft, Ford, GM etc. are all working hard to get driverless cars out on the road. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 8:21 pm
In a recent Northern District of California ruling, Judge Tigar found that the plaintiffs, owners and lessees of certain Ford Escape Hybrid and Mercury Mariner Hybrid vehicles, were entitled to attorney’s fees after Ford Motor Company issued a recall for the very component over which the plaintiffs had recently filed suit. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 6:54 pm by Larry
Unfortunately, it is and it points up a problem in litigation.This thought is brought to you by Ford Motor Company v. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 10:00 am by Michael O'Connor & Associates, LLC
The airbags were manufactured by Japanese company Takata, who will continue to see more vehicles equipped with their product recalled as time progresses. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 10:20 am by Jonathan M. Gitlin
(credit: Jonathan Gitlin) We've been hitting the tech of self-driving cars pretty heavily this week, taking a look at what companies like Audi, BMW, Ford, QNX, and Tesla are doing in the field. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 6:10 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Interestingly, it was Robert McNamara, who was in the United States Army Air Force during WWII, that realized the airplane seat belt could save lives on the road, and, as president of Ford Motor Company, pushed for safety increases in all cars. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 7:47 pm by Larry
Unfortunately, this one seems to have finally been put out of its misery.I am talking about the notion pursued with vigor and righteousness by Ford Motor Company concerning post-entry NAFTA claims. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 11:55 am by Eric Goldman
See Elvis Presley, 141 F.3d at 204; Ford Motor Company, 671 F.3d at 532. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 12:16 pm by Patrick E. Knie
Ford Motor Company The post South Carolina Plant Employee Was “User” of Product for Sodium Bromate for Purposes of Strict Product Liability Analysis – Lawing v. [read post]