Search for: "Forfeiture Counsel" Results 621 - 640 of 1,333
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2016, 1:13 pm by Alyson Grine
These include a $60.00 non-waivable Appointment of Counsel Fee for Indigent Defendants, a Community Service Supervision Fee of $250.00, and a Probation Supervision Fee of $40.00 per month. [read post]
23 May 2016, 1:13 pm by Alyson Grine
These include a $60.00 non-waivable Appointment of Counsel Fee for Indigent Defendants, a Community Service Supervision Fee of $250.00, and a Probation Supervision Fee of $40.00 per month. [read post]
  Nor would the bill affect non-solicit provisions, non-disclosure agreements, non-competes made in connection with the sale of a business (or otherwise made outside of employment relationships), forfeiture agreements, or agreements not to reapply for employment. [read post]
19 May 2016, 5:30 pm by Rory Little
In that sentence, Justice Ginsburg pointedly cited to a 1983 opinion (U.S. v. $8,850) that Justice Elena Kagan had championed at oral argument, which applied the Barker factors to another delay context, in civil asset forfeiture proceedings. [read post]
11 May 2016, 9:19 am by Frankl & Kominsky, P.A.
Accordingly, if you’ve been harmed as result of possible medical negligence, you should consider finding counsel experienced with the idiosyncrasies of medical negligence litigation. [read post]
11 May 2016, 9:19 am by Frankl & Kominsky, P.A.
Accordingly, if you’ve been harmed as result of possible medical negligence, you should consider finding counsel experienced with the idiosyncrasies of medical negligence litigation. [read post]
11 May 2016, 9:19 am by Frankl & Kominsky, P.A.
Accordingly, if you’ve been harmed as result of possible medical negligence, you should consider finding counsel experienced with the idiosyncrasies of medical negligence litigation. [read post]
4 May 2016, 12:00 am by proliability13
If the initial judgment does not include an award of section 408.040 post-judgment interest and there is no timely request for such interest in an authorized post-judgment motion, the result is forfeiture of such interest. [read post]
2 May 2016, 8:30 am by MBettman
Constitution (Guarantees that no person shall be compelled in a criminal case to be a witness against himself, as well as a right to due process of law, including a right to counsel.) [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 5:06 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Among other things, the court noted that the bank’s late notice had prevented the insurer the opportunity to participate in the selection of counsel, to speak with counsel, and to discuss credible defense strategies for dismissing Cueto’s suit (including in particular the Illinois court’s lack of personal jurisdiction over the bank). [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 7:32 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Montana) to forfeiture and the right to counsel of choice (Luis v. [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 6:26 am by Chris Castle
Eric Schmidt Refusing to Answer Questions from Senator John Cornyn on the Advice of Counsel Timeline of Google’s Resistance to General Hood’s Investigation Where were we then, back in October 2014? [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 12:24 pm by John Floyd
The Sixth Amendment right to counsel in this country is constitutionally sacrosanct. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 5:18 am by Amy Howe
  At Bloomberg BNA, Lance Rogers reports that “Court watchers have characterized the decision as an important victory for the Sixth Amendment right to counsel because the court’s previous forfeiture decisions suggested that the right was much more restricted and forfeitures have been on the rise. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 6:00 am by Doug Leavitt
Undoubtedly there will be extensive litigation over the interpretation over what a “reasonable fee for the assistance of counsel” means as that term was used by the Supreme Court. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 6:00 am by Doug Leavitt
Undoubtedly there will be extensive litigation over the interpretation over what a “reasonable fee for the assistance of counsel” means as that term was used by the Supreme Court. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 3:27 pm by Giles Peaker
Because forfeiture or possession proceedings may be the result. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 4:05 am by Amy Howe
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel on amicus briefs filed in support of the respondents in Friedrichs and Zubik. [read post]