Search for: "Grant v. U.s.*"
Results 621 - 640
of 11,802
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2010, 9:18 am
The Court has granted cert. in a single case, Dolan v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 9:24 pm
On its second opportunity, the United States Supreme Court has granted a writ of certiorari to hear an appeal of Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 9:22 pm
On its second opportunity, the United States Supreme Court has granted a writ of certiorari to hear an appeal of Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 5:00 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 8:11 am
Wickliffe v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 5:13 am
Sealed Appellant v. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 8:59 am
., et al. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 10:12 am
§ 2251(a)(3); McFarland v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 10:45 am
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); another based on Cuyler v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 8:09 am
The Second Circuit today in US v. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 8:45 am
P.F.V. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 3:00 pm
The Court previously granted certiorari to resolve this question in Board of Education of New York v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 12:15 pm
On Monday, the Court granted cert. in M.B.Z. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 10:23 pm
Unlike in the ACLU v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 6:44 pm
Review Granted Sanchez v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 8:07 am
by Dennis Crouch The Supreme Court has granted a petition for writ of certiorari in the pending patent case of Life Tech. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 11:27 am
In 2005, the Court granted certiorari on related issues in Laboratory Corp. of America v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 3:07 am
Odena v. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 1:49 am
Without hearing, their motion was granted in part and denied in part.The case deals with allegedly defamatory speech involving two private parties in a matter of a private concern. [read post]
3 May 2007, 7:42 am
Frederick Motz (not approved for publication).In a case filed pro se by a former employee ("Ivy") against her former employer ("Board of Education"), upon consideration of the Board of Education's motion for summary judgment, the judge GRANTED the motion, finding that Ivy had presented no evidence to support her claims of race, religious, age and disability discrimination.The Memorandum and Order are available in PDF format. [read post]
