Search for: "Green v Brown" Results 621 - 640 of 649
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2007, 7:16 am
Below you will find the UCP affiliates for Illinois: UCP of Illinois 310 East Adams Springfield, IL 62701 Phone: (217) 528-9681; (877) 550-8274 (Toll Free) Fax: (217) 528-9739 E-mail: UCPIL@sbcglobal.net Web: http://www.ucpillinois.com UCP of Will County 311 South Reed Street Joliet, IL 60436 Phone: (815) 744-3500 Fax: (815) 744-3504 E-mail: ucpwill@ucpwill.org Web: http://www.ucpwill.org Counties covered: Ford, Grundy, Iroquois, Kankakee, Kendall, Will UCP Land of Lincoln 130 North 16th… [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 8:19 am
" As the youngest member of the Little Rock Nine, Carlotta LaNier remembered reading about Brown v Board of Education in her weekly reader. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
According to one press report, Angel Diaz "appeared to be moving 24 minutes after the first injection, grimacing, blinking, licking his lips, blowing and appearing to mouth words". [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 7:52 am
I have gone green… from writing about ‘green issues’ and I have just seen the cricket score… England 88-9…. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 1:11 am
The justices have already agreed to hear a similar case, Riegel v. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 7:50 am
Green, 111 F.3d 515 (7th Cir. 1997)], which in turn relied on the attenuation factors provided in Brown. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:04 pm
Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973), and Texas Department of Community Affairs v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 2:40 am
Pakhomious Coptic Orthodox Church an application for a real property tax exemption 599 A7936 Jaffee -- Authorizes Congregation Ribnitz, Inc. to retroactively apply for a property tax exemption 598 A7905 Lopez V (MS) -- Relates to the shelter allowance for individuals and families receiving public assistance and residing in city, state, or federal public housing 597 A7892 Brook-Krasny (MS) -- Relates to shareholder votes in mutual… [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 1:50 am
Here we are more than half a century after Brown v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 11:12 am
It is cross-posted from DMI Blog: Today, in the latest in a string of questionable decisions by the Supreme Court, five of our nine justices decided that the monumental 1954 Brown v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 6:05 am
The result of respecting "private preferences" was essentially to lock in the status quo.In 1968, the Supreme Court, in Green v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 4:01 am
Over the next decade, that interpretation of Brown became increasingly untenable as a legal matter, and was decisively rejected in Green v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 6:25 am
Gayla Crain, a member of Epstein Becker Green Wickliff & Hall in Dallas, says labor and employment lawyers are closely watching EEOC v. [read post]
30 May 2007, 4:15 pm
Rick Hasen discusses the Sanchez v. [read post]
15 May 2007, 2:39 am
For Green's lawyer, the decision from the 3rd Circuit in Green v. [read post]