Search for: "HALE v. HALE"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,471
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2015, 3:57 pm
Lady Hale accepts the validity of these criticisms and finds (para.36) that WCC gave no serious consideration to its obligations in Ms N’s case. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 4:37 am
On 6 December 2017, the Supreme Court unanimously allowed the appeal in O’Connor v Bar Standards Board [2017] UKSC 78. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 1:31 pm
Hale, 2009 U.S. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:05 pm
§ 2680(a), is categorically inapplicable to intentional torts and bad-faith conduct; (2) whether Nevada may refuse to extend to sister States haled into Nevada courts the same immunities Nevada enjoys in those courts; and (3) whether Nevada v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 9:09 am
The Supreme Court Lady Hale and Lords Kerr, Wilson, Hughes and Hodge unanimously allowed the appeals by consent. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 9:22 pm
Seth Waxman is the chair of the Appellate and Supreme Court Litigation Practice Group at Wilmer Hale. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 8:28 am
One of them takes one aspect of the ongoing Nokia v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 12:00 am
Lady Hale at §207 and Lord Kerr at §248) they also approved his formulation. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 11:00 am
Lady Hale Lady Hale is renowned for her strident liberal and humanitarian views. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 3:09 am
Lady Hale agreed with the majority, but noted that since Mr Catt has not been and is not likely to be involved in criminal activity, it would have been disproportionate to keep a nominal record about him. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 6:18 am
The judgment Lord Wilson gave the leading judgment, with which Lady Hale, Lord Carnwath, Lord Hodge and Lady Arden agreed. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 2:34 am
Lady Hale gave the only substantive judgment, with which the other justices agreed. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 3:12 am
Lord Kerr and Lady Hale, dissenting on the issue of improper motive, considered that the Court of Appeal should have recognised that there was a substantial possibility that the Administrative Court would have taken a different view of the evidence heard in cross-examination if they had admitted the cable and the case had proceeded to its conventional conclusion. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 3:37 pm
In fact, the future was barely considered at all, so that Birmingham's case really fell at the first hurdle - after all, that is precisely what Baroness Hale was requiring local authorities to do in Moran (and, it might be added, significantly lowering the threshold for a finding of homelessness). [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 1:04 pm
In Corporacion Aero Angeles v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 3:37 pm
In fact, the future was barely considered at all, so that Birmingham's case really fell at the first hurdle - after all, that is precisely what Baroness Hale was requiring local authorities to do in Moran (and, it might be added, significantly lowering the threshold for a finding of homelessness). [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 4:38 am
In relation to the provision of accommodation under the National Assistance Act 1948, my noble and learned friend, Baroness Hale of Richmond, then Hale LJ, said in R (Wahid) v Tower Hamlets London Borough Council [2002] EWCA Civ 287 [2003] HLR 13, para 33, "[n]eed is a relative concept, which trained and experienced social workers are much better equipped to assess than are lawyers and courts, provided that they act rationally". [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 7:57 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
23 May 2009, 7:51 am
Let's go back to 1895 and the Supreme Court decision in Coffin v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 3:07 pm
In Walden v. [read post]
