Search for: "HALE v. STATE"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,076
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2012, 2:39 pm
DuPont v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 11:06 am
Barrett v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 7:34 am
United States, 365 U. [read post]
24 May 2016, 5:32 am
See, Ari v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 1:35 am
The Lord Advocate states he will address alternatives. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 1:00 am
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
22 May 2017, 1:00 am
R (Kiarie) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Byndloss) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15-16 February 2017. [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 4:07 pm
On 16 February 2021 Tipples J handed down judgment in the libel and data protection case of Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] EWHC 269 (QB). [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 9:30 pm
On the first day after a long Thanksgiving weekend, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied, without stating any particular reasons, a petition filed by Samsung earlier this month for a further rehearing en banc in an Apple v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 5:23 am
In R (M) v Slough BC [2008] UKHL 52 Baroness Hale held that “care and attention” meant “looking after” someone and “looking after” meant doing something for the person being cared for which he cannot or should not be expected to do for himself.SL had attempted suicide in 2009 after he had become homeless. [read post]
20 May 2013, 5:23 am
In R (M) v Slough BC [2008] UKHL 52 Baroness Hale held that “care and attention” meant “looking after” someone and “looking after” meant doing something for the person being cared for which he cannot or should not be expected to do for himself.SL had attempted suicide in 2009 after he had become homeless. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 4:38 am
In relation to the provision of accommodation under the National Assistance Act 1948, my noble and learned friend, Baroness Hale of Richmond, then Hale LJ, said in R (Wahid) v Tower Hamlets London Borough Council [2002] EWCA Civ 287 [2003] HLR 13, para 33, "[n]eed is a relative concept, which trained and experienced social workers are much better equipped to assess than are lawyers and courts, provided that they act rationally". [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 8:50 am
In Gridiron Management Group LLC v. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm
So, to hale them into court, the Art Owners must demonstrate that this case falls within one of the FSIA’s exceptions. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm
Moreover, he rejected Baroness Hale’s doubts in a recent House of Lords case that consent could truly be act specific. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 10:43 am
Dodd-Frank gave the SEC power to hale him before the ALJs. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 5:32 am
The state would have been open to criticism if it did not provide her with adequate protection. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
