Search for: "HARRIS v. STATE"
Results 621 - 640
of 5,162
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2010, 11:15 am
Virginia in 1967, when only 17 states still banned interracial marriage; or Lawrence v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 12:43 pm
Miller III, who is the son of Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 5:21 am
California and United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 9:38 am
”) State of Ohio v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 9:38 am
As reported here in April, an Illinois federal district court certified a privacy class that could number tens of millions of plaintiffs in the case of Harris v. comScore. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 2:46 pm
The revolution seemed over two years later, when the Court decided in Harris v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 8:16 am
State, which according to the prosecutors' association held that, "By vacating and remanding a case from the San Antonio court of appeals, Aviles v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 5:31 pm
Further, as Lord Coledridge said in Harris v Qarre (1879) 4 CPD 125, an action for defamation turns not on the fact of a defendant having used defamatory expressions, but the fact of him having used those defamatory expressions. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 7:15 am
Harris. [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 10:32 am
(See Atkins v. [read post]
30 Apr 2025, 10:47 pm
” That’s precisely what happened according to Angela Harris in Harris v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 1:37 pm
The Court decided yesterday in Harris v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 4:30 am
Harris v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 11:54 am
We are pleased to report to you about a recent decision from Kings County Civil Court captioned LVNV Funding LLC v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 7:00 am
The Sixth Circuit recently held in EEOC v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 2:15 pm
:)Aqua Log Inc. v. [read post]
7 May 2007, 8:49 am
Harry First, an antitrust professor at NYU, received an email yesterday with news of Alcoa’s $26.9 billion bid for Alcan. [read post]
16 Jun 2005, 11:00 am
Ct. 2531 (2004), United States v. [read post]
1 May 2025, 7:32 am
Zelman v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 10:48 am
As Justice Blackmun presciently stated in his dissent in Webster v. [read post]
