Search for: "Hales v. Hales"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,470
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2015, 7:30 am
He applied his Guidance on the Identification of the Ordinary Residence of People in Need of Community Care Services, England, which purported to apply the House of Lords judgment in R v Barnet LBC, ex parte Shah [1983] 2 AC 309 and Turner J’s judgment in R v Waltham Forest, ex parte Vale The Times, 25 February 1985. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 1:30 am
Lord Kerr and Lord Hughes agreed with Lady Hale. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 4:15 am
In relation to the first issue, Lord Reed in his judgment (with which Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Sumption and Lord Hodge agreed) noted that the decisions taken under rule 45(2) in these two cases were not taken by the Secretary of State, but instead by a senior prison officer or “operational manager”. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 2:00 am
Lord Clarke gave a dissenting judgment, with which Lady Hale agreed. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 2:00 am
Lord Clarke (with whom Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale and Lord Sumption agreed) gave judgment for the majority, finding that the policy of the Police Service of Northern Ireland (“PSNI”) to indefinitely retain the biometric data of adults convicted of recordable offences was proportionate. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 4:55 am
ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 4, Lady Hale at para 21 quoted with approval the observation of the Grand Chamber of the ECtHR in Neulinger v Switzerland (2010) 28 BHRC 706, para 131, that “the Convention cannot be interpreted in a vacuum but must be interpreted in harmony with the general principles of international law”. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 5:09 am
In the case of Pham (formerly “B2”), Lord Neuberger PSC, Lady Hale DPSC and Lord Mance, Lord Wilson, Lord Sumption, Lord Reed and Lord Carnwath JJSC unanimously dismissed the suspected terrorist’s appeal. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 3:54 am
Lord Hale stated the appellant was clearly entitled to a declaration that the application of the settlement criterion breached her rights under art 14 and A2P1 of the convention. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 3:26 am
Lady Hale set out the terms of the reference to the court and stated in the view of the court, the principled solution to the case would be to treat the care component of DLA as an invalidity benefit for the purpose of the Council Regulation (EC) No 1408/71. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 1:54 pm
In ZH (Tanzania) [2011] UKSC 4, Baroness Hale said, [33], “This means that they must be considered first. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:53 am
Lord Clarke gave a dissenting judgment, with which Lady Hale agreed, arguing that the costs recovery scheme was disproportionate because it did not treat all defendants in the same way and instead chose a certain class of defendants to impose liabilities beyond the bounds of what was reasonable or proportionate. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:34 am
Lord Clarke gave a dissenting judgment, with which Lady Hale agreed. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 1:00 am
The appeal was heard by Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr, and Lord Clarke on 22 June 2015 and can be viewed on demand on the Supreme Court’s website. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:05 pm
§ 2680(a), is categorically inapplicable to intentional torts and bad-faith conduct; (2) whether Nevada may refuse to extend to sister States haled into Nevada courts the same immunities Nevada enjoys in those courts; and (3) whether Nevada v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 7:43 am
Thus in Pham v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
Lord Sumption, referring to Lord Hoffmann’s speech in Matadeen v Pointu [1999] 1 AC 98 and that of Baroness Hale in Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] 2 AC 557, stated that the principle of equality was “not a principle special to the jurisprudence of the European Union. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 6:45 am
But there we go – that is the “Carrollian” effect of the rule to which both Lord Neuberger and Baroness Hale referred. [read post]
28 May 2015, 3:15 pm
In Knight v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 4:43 am
That was on the basis of the House of Lords decision in Din v Wandsworth LBC and the Court of Appeal decision in Dyson v Kerrier DC. [read post]
20 May 2015, 4:09 am
Supreme Court decision The Supreme Court, in a leading judgment from Lady Hale and Lord Toulson and a supplementary judgment from Lord Neuberger, discharged the injunction and reversed the decision of the Court of Appeal. [read post]
