Search for: "Hall v. United States Government" Results 621 - 640 of 1,153
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2017, 11:51 am by Mark Walsh
“Does [due process] require a ‘nexus’ between the United States and a non-resident alien to apply to him extraterritorially a federal criminal statute? [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
Department or Homeland Security issued a “National Terrorism Advisory System (NTAS) Bulletin,” warning of, “a heightened threat environment across the United States,” and, “violent riots have continued in recent days,” and, “ideologically-motivated actors” could incite further violence. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 2:44 pm
United States, 340 U.S. 135 (1950), the Supreme Court articulated a specific immunity doctrine for soldiers suing the government for such injuries).The question with regard to contractors, however, is whether these governmental immunities extend to them also. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:39 pm by Quinta Jurecic
The president-elect will soon learn the United States’ “deep secrets,” Bob Woodward writes at the Post—that is, its covert actions and intelligence sources and methods. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 6:10 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Someone raised a First Amendment objection to the morphing prohibition, but the Second Circuit will have none of this.The case is United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 7:55 am
This is the Iowa cerebral palsy resource guide; this guide was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
20 May 2016, 8:29 am by Lyle Denniston
His order blocking enforcement is now under review by the Justices in the case of United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
If I were to include a single additional case from a court, I would include one from a federal trial court rather than the Supreme Court: future Justice William Woods’s United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 11:02 am by Christa Culver
BennettDocket: 10-238Issue(s): (1) Whether the First Amendment forbids states from providing additional government subsidies to publicly financed candidates that are triggered by independent expenditure groups' speech against such candidates; and (2) whether the First Amendment forbids states from providing additional government subsidies to publicly financed candidates that are triggered by the fundraising or expenditures by these candidates' privately… [read post]