Search for: "Harms v. United States of America" Results 621 - 640 of 1,520
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2016, 7:00 am by Steven Boutwell
Because the accident occurred upon the navigable waterways of the United States, admiralty jurisdiction and general maritime law applied to this case. [read post]
28 May 2009, 11:00 am
 Holding that there was in fact sufficient evidence to support a finding of punitive damages, the court reviewed whether the size of the punitive damages award is excessive in violation of the due process standards set out by the United States Supreme Court in BMW of North America, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  If one compares the United States Constitution with the fifty state constitutions, let alone most modern foreign constitutions, it is easily the least democratic constitution in the mix. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 1:25 pm by WIMS
Circuit, Case No. 11-1302, EME Homer City Generation, L.P v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 3:54 am by SHG
President Obama’s bizarre reference to his having taught constitutional law, followed by his misstatement of Oliver Wendell Holmes’ abandoned analogy of “yelling fire in a crowed theater” from United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
In the United States, federal agencies such as the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), or the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and their state analogues, regularly set exposure standards that could not and should not hold up in a common-law tort case. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:00 am by Zach Abels
He seeks to cripple the civilian agencies—the State Department, USAID, and the United States Institute of Peace—that consolidate combat success into political victory. [read post]
26 Nov 2020, 11:03 am by Josh Blackman
The State of New York will, and should, seek ways of appropriately recognizing the religious interests here at issue without risking harm to the health and safety of the people of New York. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 9:08 pm by Francis Pileggi
The professor’s argument is based in part on the recent United States Supreme Court decision in Nicastro. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
” Second, the drug is neither prescribed by a doctor or psychiatrist nor dispensed by a pharmacist, and has not been studied in the United States to determine its interaction with other drugs. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Ron DeSantis to accept state residents off Holland America cruise ships, USA Today (last updated April 2, 2020). [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 5:08 am by Russell Jackson
  The second is perhaps more difficult for some people to swallow:  "Because the United States is a distinct sovereign, a defendant may in principle be subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of the United States but not of any particular State. [read post]