Search for: "Held v. State"
Results 621 - 640
of 82,095
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2019, 2:00 am
Supreme Court held that by taxing the federal pension benefits of U.S. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 6:09 pm
State v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 11:38 am
A unanimous panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has held that the United States Department of the Interior violated the Outer Continental Shelf Deep Water Royalty Relief Act (“RRA”) by imposing price threshold conditions that require federal lessees to pay royalties when commodity prices rise. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 7:20 am
The summary judgment hearing in Tafas v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 1:12 pm
Taamneh failed to state a claim upon which the court could grant relief. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 3:37 am
By Nina Rice* The history of New York’s statutory law pertaining to the art market is relatively brief despite the state’s long held status as the art capital of the United States, if not the world. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:52 am
The post Case Comment: R (Reilly & Anor) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 8:48 pm
Ruling jointly along with United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 6:35 am
The post State v. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 12:22 pm
In State v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 1:30 am
The Supreme Court yesterday handed down judgment in TN, MA and AA (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] UKSC 40, in which the Court held that a breach of the family tracing duty in Regulation 6 of the Asylum Seekers (Reception Conditions) Regulations 2005 does not affect the rule in Ravichandran requiring asylum applications to be decided on the facts existing at the date of decision. [read post]
14 May 2014, 2:06 am
For judgment, please download: [2014] UKSC 28 For Court’s press summary, please download: Court’s Press Summary For a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII The post New Judgment: R (George) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] UKSC 28 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
13 Aug 2024, 12:26 pm
Anderson, the Supreme Court unanimously held that states lack the unilateral power to exclude presidential candidates from the ballot on the basis of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 6:35 am
Here is the complaint in Atlantic Richfield Co. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 1:06 am
In Bullock v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 1:06 am
In Bullock v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 1:06 am
In Bullock v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 2:00 am
It first held that Indiana’s stated interest in “the ‘humane and dignified disposal of human remains’ ” was “not . . . legitimate. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 7:01 am
In State v. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 5:32 pm
The post Oklahoma v. [read post]
