Search for: "Hernandez v. District Court" Results 621 - 640 of 664
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2008, 7:51 am
Arnold District Court Decision:  Recoiling Against Romm           In United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 10:36 am by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
This uncertainty was acknowledged by the Florida Supreme Court in Jones v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 7:08 am by Joy Waltemath
The district court gave a “well-articulated reason” for the reduction and there was no abuse of discretion. [read post]
31 May 2022, 4:58 am by Emma Snell
Alexander Bobikin and Alexander Ivanov, who listened to the verdict standing in a reinforced glass box at the Kotelevska district court in central Ukraine, both pleaded ‘guilty’ last week. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 6:58 pm by Kathy Kapusta
In support of its position, the company relied on Raytheon Co. v Hernandez, in which the Supreme Court addressed whether the ADA conferred preferential rehire rights on disabled employees lawfully terminated for violating workplace conduct rules. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:33 am
From my LexisNexis Alerts on "Graves Amendment" court decisions come these, mostly recent New York cases:  AUTO – GRAVES AMENDMENT – LEASED VEHICLE – NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY Brown v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 6:00 am by Brian Gallini
In 1984, the Supreme Court created a now well-known “good faith” exception to the exclusionary rule in United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 10:14 am by Melody McDonald Lanier
Not to mention, it is extremely expensive, costing millions of dollars and six to eight weeks of court time. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:00 pm by Ray Beckerman
UPC Nederland (Netherlands, District Court of Utrecht)Greenbaum v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 6:29 am by Keith Lee
The district court considered the issue to be a simple matter of time and space. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 9:53 am by Joy Waltemath
A federal district court in Texas also rejected the employer’s bid to calculate damages using a formula based on a monthly average of wages instead of the traditional weekly-average formula, but the employer was granted partial summary judgment on its undisputed contention that the employees’ damages would be limited by either the two-year or three-year statutes of limitations (Hernandez v. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]