Search for: "Holmes v. Day"
Results 621 - 640
of 667
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2014, 3:04 pm
Up to $8000 per work—the statute says up to $150,000, but a jury has awarded that in Capitol Records v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:06 pm
Mayne v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 9:56 am
This case involved days of expert testimony about the various “elements” of the Gaye composition, and where those elements appeared in the Thicke-Farrell version. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 3:48 am
Kara Scannell and Kristen Holmes report for CNN. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 4:42 am
Sara Murray, Kristen Holmes, and Gabby Orr report for CNN. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 11:56 am
From Logue v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 2:50 am
On the other hand, the opposition division also held that O1's opposition was inadmissible and took a separate "additional decision" to this effect (see above point V). [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
According to Brandenburg v. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 12:01 pm
Box 1698 Jackson, MS 39215 Phone: (601) 987-4872 (V/TTY); (800) 852-8328 (V/TTY/Toll Free in MS) Web: http://www.msprojectstart.org T.K. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 9:26 am
Section 441b makes it a felony for all corporations—including nonprofit advocacy corporations—either to expressly advocate the election or defeat of candidates or to broadcast electioneering communications within 30 days of a primary election and 60 days of a general election. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:11 pm
Section 441b makes it a felony for all corporations—including nonprofit advocacy corporations—either to expressly advocate the election or defeat of candidates or to broadcast electioneering communications within 30 days of a primary election and 60 days of a general election. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 1:40 pm
has a great idea—giving every citizen a voucher to direct at any source s/he wants, in return for making the information public domain a day after publication. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 8:47 am
Appeal from Johnson district court; PETER V. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 4:31 am
Their primary objective was to have Vice President Mike Pence in his presiding role on that day either block Congress from recognizing Joe Biden’s win at all or at least to delay the electoral count. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 12:47 pm
My response to that is to quote Justice Holmes in Lochner v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 9:30 pm
[We grateful to Victoria Saker Woeste of the American Bar Foundation (vswoeste@abfn.org) for this full report of an excellent conference. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 5:01 am
For sex-related speech, the Supreme Court finally abandoned the test in 1957 in Roth v. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 5:01 am
For sex-related speech, the Supreme Court finally abandoned the test in 1957 in Roth v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 4:30 pm
” You may recognize the dialogue between me and my platoon sergeant as a parable sometimes told of detective Sherlock Holmes and his assistant Dr. [read post]
