Search for: "Human v. State" Results 621 - 640 of 19,536
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2014, 8:46 am by Wells Bennett
That battle and others like it led to an overwhelming consensus in the international community that toxic chemicals should never again be used as weapons against human beings. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 4:03 pm by nflatow
Shell Petroleum, this time on the question of whether the 200-year-old Alien Tort Statute applies to human rights violations that occur outside the United States. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 10:05 am by scanner1
STATE OF MONTANA, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLICH HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT DIVISION, Respondent and Appellee. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 7:14 am by scanner1
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION, HUMAN RESOURCES DIVISION, STATE OF MONTANA, BOARD OF PERSONNEL APPEALS, Respondents and Appellees. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 1:22 am
“Last December the European Court of Human Rights decided in S and Marper v The United Kingdom that the retention by the State of DNA profiles is a breach of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 9:00 pm by Adjunct LawProfs
March 4, 2010) A federal district court in New York has ruled that the New York State Human Rights Law (NYSHRL) and New York City Human Rights Law (NYCHRL) apply when a... [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:35 am by Melina Padron
RK (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 456 (20 April 2011)  Court of appeal sends Zimbabwean asylum case back to tribunal as need more evidence as to whether they would have to lie about political beliefs. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
It first held that Indiana’s stated interest in “the ‘humane and dignified disposal of human remains’ ” was “not . . . legitimate. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm by Bernard Bell
United States Citizenship & Immigration Services. 407 F.Supp.3d 311 (D.D.C. 2019); Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:41 am by 1 Crown Office Row
His at times toughly-worded lecture to the UCL Judicial Institute and the Bingham Centre for the Rule of Law chimes with what the Attorney General Dominic Grieve has been saying recently about the need for primary responsibility for human rights protection to lie with states, not Strasbourg – and Grieve will surely approve of both the content and timing of Lord Irvine’s intervention, on the eve of the European Court’s ruling in Al-Khawaja and Tahery… [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:54 am by Graeme Hall
In the courts: BN, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2367 (Admin) (16 September 2011): Sec of State irrational in ignoring fresh evidence in Malawi asylum claim. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
United States are taught to every first-year law student. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:25 am by Graeme Hall
RU (Bangladesh) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 651 (08 June 2011): No error of law deporting Bangladeshi man convicted of complicity in shooting. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 4:30 am by INFORRM
Whilst the law may have changed in spite of the Human Rights Act, it is notable that in the United States, where there is no constitutionally enshrined right to privacy, private phone hacking is not as strictly regulated. [read post]