Search for: "IN RE MARK K" Results 621 - 640 of 1,415
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2016, 3:27 am by Julie Kim
Clients who ask for hand-marked comments on a PDF version of the proxy statement. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 3:27 am by Julie Kim
Clients who ask for hand-marked comments on a PDF version of the proxy statement. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:25 am
 In In re Mark C., supra, 244 Cal.App.4th 520, Division Two followed its earlier decision in In re Erica R., supra, 240 Cal.App.4th 907&n [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 3:02 am
 According to these re-interpretations, a drug that is unavoidably unsafe should not bring design-based liability; but unavoidability should be proven, not presumed. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 3:05 am
Appearing pro se, it sought cancellation of Hormel's registration for the mark SKIPPY for peanut butter, but the Board granted Hormel's motion for summary judgment on the ground of claim preclusion (a/k/a res judicata). [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:24 pm by Howard Knopf
Overall, there are some good legal findings in the current K-12 decision, from the standpoint of public policy. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 6:15 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
In our example, you’ll note that it’s marked sample – and there’s nothing filled in. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 5:19 am
  So now, as our learned intermediary headcount post describes in detail, there is precedent following the learned intermediary rule in every state in the country – ranging from high court or statutory authority in 38 states (and DC), to a Vermont state trial court at the other extreme.Plainly, reports of the death of the learned intermediary rule have, in the words of Mark Twain, have been greatly exaggerated. [read post]