Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE A GRAND JURY." Results 621 - 640 of 1,008
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2014, 4:59 pm
No state constitutional language or case law requires that matters preliminary to a potential felony indictment be conducted or processed only after a grand jury proceeding. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 2:31 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Although Y did not ultimately testify before a federal grand jury, he took part in approximately four debriefings with federal prosecutors and investigators in the Southern District during the latter part of February and March 1993. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 4:46 pm by Stephen Bilkis
At the time the matter was resubmitted, no action was pending against defendant in a local criminal court, or in any court, and thus the prosecution was under no statutory duty to inform defendant that a second grand jury presentation against him would be made. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 11:26 am by Daniel A. Burton, Esq.
  Accordingly, it is imperative that any party that is currently restrained to make sure that any and all orders have been revoked before any contact or communication is made with the other party. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 10:59 am by Katherine McCoy
The DOI-OIG may then refer the case to the United States Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution, which in turn may bring the matter before a grand jury to seek an indictment. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 10:59 am by Liskow & Lewis
The DOI-OIG may then refer the case to the United States Attorney’s Office for criminal prosecution, which in turn may bring the matter before a grand jury to seek an indictment. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 6:16 am
This article also contends that, as a matter of sound public policy, crime victims should have rights before the formal filing of criminal charges. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 4:49 pm by Stephen Bilkis
We are agreed that it would not have been sufficient. 'The competent testimony before the Grand Jury consists of the admission of the defendant without any additional proof that the crime charged has been committed. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 1:24 pm by Stephen Bilkis
This is a proceeding wherein the Defendant appeared before the Court for a risk level determination pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA). [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:15 pm by Bob Farb
A witness who invokes the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination in any criminal or civil hearing or proceeding, including a grand jury, may be ordered to testify or produce other information when the witness has been granted immunity under Article 61 of Chapter 15A. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 4:50 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The standard of proof in a Grand Jury proceeding is "sufficient evidence and reasonable grounds to believe the defendant committed the offense charged. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 11:01 am by Gritsforbreakfast
'At Texas Monthly, Dan Solomon followed up on Lisa Falkenberg's reporting about grand jury misconduct with a short essay titled, "Is the grand jury system broken? [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 7:30 pm
While the court was awaiting the People's response, the prosecutor, unbeknownst to the court, presented both the defendant matters to a special narcotics grand jury. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by John Dean
” But the most historic case that Nixon asked the Court to resolve was the question of his power as president to withhold information from a grand jury relating to Watergate. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 7:30 pm
A Queens Criminal Lawyer said that while the court was awaiting the People's response, the prosecutor, unbeknownst to the court, presented both the defendant matters to a special narcotics grand jury. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 7:47 pm
As a result of the plea before Justice, the charges relating to the car accident noted above were dismissed. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 5:12 pm by Stephen Bilkis
But, the court is singularly unimpressed with the alternative explanation offered by the prosecutor, to the effect that since the witness found it inconvenient to appear and testify before the grand jury, the proceeding was continued, resulting in the grand jury having already heard the police officer's testimony, thereby forcing the prosecutor to question the witness about the lineup procedure. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by KC Johnson
(They did so, though in ways that trouble me—suggesting that in the 4th Circuit colleges have no obligation to enforce the student bulletin or faculty handbook, at least in cases where disfavored groups of students are targeted by powerful faculty interests on campus; and victims have no grounds for a federal civil rights lawsuit when prosecutors and police conspire to frame innocent people, provided the police are internally candid about their lack of evidence and the prosecutor obtains a… [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 8:56 pm by Benjamin Wittes
In the criminal context, think of Rule 6(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, which prohibits disclosure of proceedings taking place before a grand jury, which hears all sorts of raw allegations and impressions. [read post]