Search for: "ITS SERVICES, INC"
Results 621 - 640
of 33,450
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2008, 12:52 am
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority has announced that SunTrust Investment Services Inc. has agreed to pay a $700,000 fine to settle allegations that it engaged in supervisory violations involving its fee-based brokerage business and charged excessive commissions on low-priced stocks. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 6:01 am
The California Department of Corporations and Real Estate announced that a loan modification service called 2nd Chance Negotiation Inc. has been ordered to stop offering its service as its not licensed to do so. [read post]
28 May 2021, 10:48 am
Medic Ambulance Services, Inc., 9th Cir., No. 20-16135, memorandum 5/4/21 (unpublished mem. available here), the plaintiff, an Emergency Medical Technician, alleged in her state law complaint that her employer, Medic Ambulance Service, Inc. [read post]
17 Dec 2006, 3:12 pm
In In re Taylor Tate, Inc., Serial No. 78463524 (December 1, 2006) [not citable], the Board found Applicant's spa services to be related to hair and skin care products, and it consequently affirmed a Section 2(d) refusal of the mark shown immediately below [DAY SPA & SHOP disclaimed] in light of the registered mark LOVJOI.Examining Attorney Ingrid C. [read post]
16 May 2016, 3:14 am
"Applicant has done nothing more than use the Twitter online community forum to engage in social-networking for its own benefit, and to advertise its online retail store services, which are rendered over its own corporate website .... [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 3:00 am
C&J Energy Services, Inc. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:29 pm
In Donohue, the plaintiff’s employer AMN Services, Inc. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 3:42 pm
KLDiscovery Inc. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 12:18 pm
The Essgekay court acknowledged the similarities between its state’s version of UCC Article 4A and other states’ versions, and how courts in other states have applied the Guidance when analyzing the commercial reasonableness of a bank’s security procedures, citing Choice Escrow and another earlier case, Patco Construction Co., Inc. v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 3:00 am
The case of the day is Baker Hughes Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 3:58 am
Magnificence Carriers, Inc. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 7:30 am
It may be difficult for PayPal to establish relatedness as between its payment and money-transfer goods/services versus Pandora’s music streaming goods/services. [read post]
12 May 2015, 7:23 am
Last week, the Federal Trade Commission announced its first settlement with a retail tracking company, resolving allegations that Nomi Technologies, Inc., a micro-location platform that provides analytics services to retailers through its product “Listen,” failed to abide by several promises it made in its privacy policy. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 5:07 am
In re PayClerk, Inc., Serial No. 76594440 (October 4, 2007) [not precedential].Faced with a mere descriptiveness refusal, Applicant PayClerk, Inc. amended its application to seek registration on the Supplemental Register. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 12:08 pm
When the plaintiffs signed up to become Uber drivers, they had agreed to its technology services agreement, which contained a mandatory arbitration agreement governed by the FAA that had a class action waiver provision. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 1:28 pm
[*Remed] Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 10:39 pm
America Online, Inc., 129 F.3d 327, 330 (4th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 524 U.S. 937 (1998). [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 10:37 am
Defendants Platform Taxi Service, Inc. move for an on order, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing the Verified Complaint of plaintiff Sheryl Azevedo, on the ground that she did not sustain a "serious injury" within the meaning of Insurance Law §5102 (d) as a result of the February 21, 2007 accident. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 8:30 am
Last month the Fifth Circuit issued its first (to my knowledge) ruling that turned on Section 230. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 8:30 am
Last month the Fifth Circuit issued its first (to my knowledge) ruling that turned on Section 230. [read post]
