Search for: "Iconics, Inc."
Results 621 - 640
of 1,120
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2014, 3:00 am
Supreme Court on Monday revived a copyright lawsuit against movie studio Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc. concerning an early screenplay for what became the iconic boxing movie "Raging Bull. [read post]
15 May 2014, 9:06 am
” In Highmark Inc. v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 7:19 pm
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc., and Highmark Inc. v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 1:28 pm
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc., Octane had been sued by ICON for infringing on ICON’s patent for adjustable elliptical machines. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:54 am
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc., 2014 U.S. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:21 am
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., was the primary decision because the Court explained that the ruling formed the basis of their decision in Highmark, Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 8:52 am
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., 572 U. [read post]
5 May 2014, 4:15 am
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. broadened the “exceptional case” rubric used to determine when an award of attorney fees is appropriate in a district court patent dispute. [read post]
4 May 2014, 3:14 am
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. [read post]
2 May 2014, 9:59 pm
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. and Highmark Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 2:59 pm
ICON sued Octane for patent infringement. [read post]
1 May 2014, 9:05 pm
ICON and Highmark v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 9:25 am
ICON Health and Fitness, Inc., which makes it easier for a wrongfully accused defendant in a patent action to recover fees from a plaintiff, I am more interested in whether this same new decision will make it a little less likely that a wealthier company with a questionable patent will take to the courts to try to shut down a comparatively less wealthy competitor or, if not shut them down, to at least bog them down in litigation they cannot afford except by shortchanging their… [read post]
1 May 2014, 7:01 am
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc., No. 12-1184 (Apr. 29, 2014). [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 3:40 pm
Meanwhile, David Berry, writing for PatLit, discusses Octane Fitness LLC v ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., No. 12-1184 (U.S. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 2:00 pm
Icon Health and Highmark Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 9:38 am
The determination of whether a case is “exceptional” under the attorney fee-shifting provision of The Patent Act is left to a broad discretion of the District Court. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 8:38 am
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc., No. 12-1184 (April 29, 2014).IssueSection 285 of the Patent Act authorizes a district court to award attorney’s fees in patent litigation. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 8:38 am
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., rejects the Brooks Furniture framework as unduly rigid and inconsistent with the text of §285. [read post]
