Search for: "In Re: B "
Results 621 - 640
of 30,222
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2024, 3:10 pm
” The letter began as follows: RE: Request to Remove Infringing Material From www.thecolacorporation.com Dear Sir/Madam: I am writing on behalf of IMG Worldwide, LLC (“IMG”). [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 3:07 pm
But on Monday, she was too sleepy, so she began her trip home on the B Line. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:09 am
b) Medical devices Interoperability The EHDS also has implications for medical devices but when it comes to defining those obligations, the definitions and current drafting of the EHDS are open to interpretation. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 8:15 pm
Due to these types of cases, Kahn said, “I’m pretty sure we’re going to see more of these types of laws relaxing or eliminating the severe or pervasive standard. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 3:21 pm
Section 1229b(b)(1). [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 7:50 am
The divide is about power—the political kind—and whether using distributed generation as a vehicle to decentralize power in the electric system is more likely to promote a) a more democratic system or b) a privatized system, concentrating power in the hands of those who can afford it while disinvesting from our current system of publicly-regulated provisioning. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
If you’re looking to compare the laws of different jurisdictions, you can use our State Law Comparison Tool (under Tools & Resources at the right side of the practice area page) to compare laws on various topics. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm
The Restoration and Re-Establishment: 1660-1701, Russell Sandberg (Cardiff University, UK)6. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 2:04 pm
Stafford, 226 F.3d 275 (3d Cir. 2000); In re NVIDIA Sec. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 1:11 pm
For example, in In re GoHealth, Inc. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 10:45 am
We’re now taking the industry to the next level with this week’s launch of our second-generation legal generative AI Assistant on Lexis+ AI. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 10:01 am
Making or directing others to make public statements about known or reasonably foreseeable witnesses concerning their potential participation in the investigation or in this criminal proceeding; b. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 8:30 am
IV, § 2(B)(1)(g). [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
Mit seinem Standpunkt fördert der EDSA einen bürokratischen Leerlauf, ohne den Schutz der betroffenen Personen zu verbessern. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
“I’m really worried about that, because you’ve got the First Amendment operating in an environment of threatening circumstances from the government’s perspective, and you’re saying the government can’t interact with the source of those problems. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Many state and local officials host social media sites and use them to converse with followers on matters related to their governmental responsibilities, among other things.[1] Not surprisingly, many choose to block from their sites certain members of the public they find disagreeable.[2] Being disagreeable, or at least in disagreement with such actions, blocked followers sometimes sue alleging that their exclusion violates the First Amendment.[3] One of the most notable examples was a… [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 3:06 am
The corollary question concern whether the position is different where an appeal is filed before the application is withdrawn - in which case Article 139(2)(b) EUTMR is not triggered and the conversion process can proceed. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 1:35 am
If you’re a high earner, however, pass-through taxation could result in you leaving tax savings on the table. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 12:02 pm
I wanted to go back and re-listen to Harriet Harman’s response to my query – but in fact that has gone too. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 8:48 am
So I mean, I’m sure that when you first read the report, you’re just yawning. [read post]