Search for: "In Re EG" Results 621 - 640 of 832
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2010, 12:22 pm by David Jacobson
Should any new procedure be limited to keying in errors or extend to payments where the wrong details have been selected (eg from a drop down pay anyone list)? [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 1:59 pm by Paul Maharg
 We're approaching CALI to provide a platform (via Ron Staudt) for the report. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 11:06 am by Paul Maharg
 Supporting diverse students when in law school, eg a programme for students to go to a law firms when they're in 1L. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 11:52 am by Paul Maharg
  There are of course other institutions involved, eg Minstry of Education, Justice, the Supremem Court, prep schools etc. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 7:19 pm by Paul Maharg
  Re insurance, the insurers stated she would be treated no differently than other lawyers. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 8:33 pm
(eg Harvard-Pilgrim Health Plan in Massachusetts exiting from the Medicare Advantage business entirely? [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 6:12 am by cen
Wichtigste Neuerungen sind die Berücksichtigung der Umsetzung der EU-Richtlinie über unlautere Geschäftspraktiken im binnenmarktinternen Rechtsverkehr zwischen Unternehmen und Verbrauchern (2005/29/EG) eine umfangreiche Kommentierung zur Schwarzen Liste sowie die Kommentierung des Telefonwerbegesetzes. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 9:16 am by Dave
, can they be read as saying that the Court should adopt a review of the fairness of the procedure, i.e. is this a Wednesbury review where they’re concerned with the process or is it a merits review? [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 6:19 am
The reporter egged them on; she knows how to get their attention and did. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 2:00 am by Stephen Page
Whilst the task requires the exercise of a broad discretion capable of being exercised within ‘the generous ambit within which reasonable disagreement is possible’ (per Brennan J in Norbis at p 540) it is not generally an accounting exercise nor is it analogous to an award of damages or compensation which might call for a division into component parts.As this Court has often recognised (eg see Steinbrenner & Steinbrenner [2008] FamCAFC 193, at paragraph 234),… [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 1:12 pm by Steve McConnell
Are sales reps doing something wrong merely by visiting doctors whose use would predominantly be off-label (eg, pediatricians)? [read post]
28 Aug 2010, 1:08 pm by Lewis Gainor
Anyone thinking of relocating should talk to the probation officer first, because the consequences of leaving the state, even with a legitimate purpose, can be re-sentencing. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 12:28 am by Caroline Cross
Rather, a person need only understand proximate medical issues, namely “the nature, purpose and effects of the treatment” (per Thorpe J, Re C Adult: Refusal of treatment (1994) WLR 290). [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 4:05 pm by Jacqueline Lipton
  I also acknowledge that how many journals a person sends a submission to may depend in large part on where they are sending from eg private practice, a lower ranked school, a higher ranked school etc. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 4:08 am by David Smith
Equally, where a landlord opposes the grant of a new lease on redevelopment grounds it normally does so in the anticipation of having a substantial period of time to obtain the necessary evidence of the desire and ability to redevelop (eg. surveyors reports, architects drawings, planning consents) as the matter moves towards a trial. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 4:08 am by David Smith
Equally, where a landlord opposes the grant of a new lease on redevelopment grounds it normally does so in the anticipation of having a substantial period of time to obtain the necessary evidence of the desire and ability to redevelop (eg. surveyors reports, architects drawings, planning consents) as the matter moves towards a trial. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 3:44 am by Dave
Judge Wikeley sent the matter back to the first tier tribunal for a re-hearing with his views on a number of different points concerning when the link between IS and HB assessments can be broken. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 3:44 am by Dave
Judge Wikeley sent the matter back to the first tier tribunal for a re-hearing with his views on a number of different points concerning when the link between IS and HB assessments can be broken. [read post]