Search for: "In Re Interest of SAS"
Results 621 - 640
of 984
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2011, 2:06 am
” Jack of Kent blog 16th September - “Today’s Met Statement“ Case law which may be of some relevance: X v Morgan Grampian [1991] 1 AC 1 – interpretation of “interests of justice” in the Contempt of Court Act 1981 s.10 Secretary of State for defence v Guardian Newspapers [1984] 2 WLR 268 – “national security” in Contempt of Court Act 1981 s.10 Re an Inquiry under the Company Securities (Insider Dealing) Act 1985… [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 4:01 am
Chefs nos 1, 2 et 8, soit le complot de fraude, la complicité pour fraude entre les deux accusés et la fraude additionnelle par Michaud pendant le mandat de Berniquez St-Jean: À la lumière des trois critères établis dans R. c. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 3:30 am
Pour la dernière semaine, les trois décisions en français les plus consultées ont été: 1. [read post]
11 May 2014, 4:00 am
Every week we present a summary of a decision by a Québec court provided to us by SOQUIJ and selected to be of interest to our readers throughout Canada. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
Every week we present the summary of a decision handed down by a Québec court provided to us by SOQUIJ and considered to be of interest to our readers throughout Canada. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
Every week we present the summary of a decision handed down by a Québec court provided to us by SOQUIJ and considered to be of interest to our readers throughout Canada. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 4:00 am
Every week we present the summary of a decision handed down by a Québec court provided to us by SOQUIJ and considered to be of interest to our readers throughout Canada. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
Every week we present the summary of a decision handed down by a Québec court provided to us by SOQUIJ and considered to be of interest to our readers throughout Canada. [read post]
25 Feb 2024, 5:00 am
Every week we present the summary of a decision handed down by a Québec court provided to us by SOQUIJ and considered to be of interest to our readers throughout Canada. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 2:49 am
It will be crucial to see what the UK Supreme Court decides in Cartier next year.The audience engaged with questions and comments, and was particularly interested in the relevance of CJEU case law post-Brexit. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 8:35 am
Interested in this issue? [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 4:54 am
It will be crucial to see what the UK Supreme Court decides in Cartier next year.The audience engaged with questions and comments, and was particularly interested in the relevance of CJEU case law post-Brexit. [read post]
27 May 2017, 7:10 am
See the SA Express News coverage. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 12:29 am
The case was that of Rebekah Johnson v Les Editions De L’avenir SA, involving a bungee jumping video which appears on YouTube. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Le juge de première instance a rejeté un volet de sa réclamation, estimant qu’il s’agissait d’une demande de remboursement relevant exclusivement de la Cour canadienne de l’impôt ou de la Cour du Québec, selon le cas. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 11:06 pm
In view of the tightening of what will be allowed and not with the revised RPBA that enters into force on 01.01.2020, it wil be interested whether a future Board will come to the same conclusion.In any case, it appears that there should be a referral as this decision follows T 1914/12 which however distinguished from T 1621/09, and seems is a fundamental point of law.Legal backgroundArticle 113 - Right to be heard and basis of decisionsThe decisions of the European Patent Office… [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm
First, the interpretation of the law that Apple is defending in this case is not really in the interest of a lot of companies. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 4:00 am
Every week we present the summary of a decision handed down by a Québec court provided to us by SOQUIJ and considered to be of interest to our readers throughout Canada. [read post]
17 May 2017, 11:02 am
SAS Institute Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
Le juge ignorait cette preuve et, en l’absence d’une erreur de principe de sa part, la Cour ne peut intervenir. [read post]
