Search for: "In re: Certification of Need for Additional Judges"
Results 621 - 640
of 679
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2009, 7:08 am
View the article here | PDF I will leave my comments once I get all the testimonies added to this blog! [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 11:46 pm
Birnbaum said in a final report to a New York federal judge. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 2:34 pm
In Re Citigroup Inc. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
However, in the last thirty-five years, the Supreme Court has decided fewer than a dozen cases involving core class action issues.[3] Splits across an important range of issues continue to develop and percolate in the lower courts, and it is appropriate and urgent for the Court to provide much-needed guidance on these issues. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 4:19 am
We can only hope that the Judge gives him the extension that he needs and perhaps someone can step in who is monitoring Armstrong and Gilmore compliance and insist that the law gets respected. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
gain upper hand in Blu-ray DRM battle (Ars Technica) Africa South African Times report on state of African music, lack of support and protection (Afro-IP) Australia Australian Copyright Tribunal: consumer valuation of copyright: Audio-Visual Copyright Society (t/a Screenrights) v Foxtel and Re PPCA (IPKat) (IP finance) Innovation patents in Australia. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 9:10 pm
" In re Davis, 989 F.2d 208, 210 (6th Cir.1993). [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 10:20 pm
Finally, the funding:Treasury Secretary's request for $700 billion is authorized, with $250 billion available immediately and an additional $100 billion released upon his or her certification that funds are needed ... final $350 billion is subject to a Congressional joint resolution of disapprovalUnder current law, I don't see how Congress could authorize $700 billion, have the president sign off on it, and then undo the second half of the deal by a joint… [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 11:00 am
If you stick to the links that we gave you in the first seven paragraphs of this post, you'll have virtually everything that you need, and all from sources that are pretty reliable.Maybe we're doing some good by hosting this blog, after all. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Australian Review of National Innovation System released: (IPRoo), (Mallesons Stephen Jaques), (creativecommons.org), (IP Menu News), Senate Committee on the Judiciary approval of Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights Act 2008 and surrounding debate (Law360), (Public Knowledge), (Ars Technica), (Wired), (Public Knowledge), (Ars Technica),… [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Santos, No. 060833 Conviction for murder while engaging in a drug offense is affirmed where: 1) because some drug conspiracies in violation of 21 U.S.C. section 846 are "punishable under" section 841(b)(1)(A), criminal liability under section 848(e)(1)(A) requires no active involvement in drug distribution; 2) the nexus between a murder and a drug offense need not be more than the "substantive connection" described in US v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 8:21 pm
"To get an ID, they need a Social Security card and to get a Social Security card, they need a birth certificate," Swanson said. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Simpson, No. 07-5840 A sentence and order of restitution imposed for defendant's crime of mail fraud, involving his underreporting of payroll information for his businesses to his workers' compensation insurance carriers, is affirmed where the district court correctly concluded that the "loss" caused by this conduct was the amount of additional premiums that the insurance carriers would have charged had they been given accurate information. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 1:37 am
To get the full flavor of what went on here, one needs to read the opinion, written by Judge Rader (with Judges Newman and Friedman on the panel). [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 12:19 pm
. '27.702, WHICH AS INTERPRETED BY THISCOURT PROHIBITS CCRC FROM FILING A '1983 FEDERALRIGHTS SUIT CHALLENGING LETHAL INJECTION, ISUNCONSTITUTIONAL ............................................................................... 16 CONCLUSION AND RELIEF SOUGHT .............................................................. 22 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ................................................................................ 23 CERTIFICATE OF… [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 6:52 pm
In re ATM Fee Antitrust Litigation, N.D. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 12:52 am
In re ATM Fee Antitrust Litigation, N.D. [read post]
12 May 2008, 4:30 am
This agreement I believe will meet your original specifications, with the inclusion of the additional information addressed in the faxes. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 2:51 am
That's probably a sound media strategy, but at the end of the day, in front of a judge, they shouldn't get to have it both ways.If all of the additional "girls" they're now counting actually told DFPS they're 18 or older, and the agency has no documentary proof besides their suspicions that the women are lying, that puts a little different spin on it than most of the headlines today. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 5:52 am
You need a subscription to read the article, but here's a link to the website. [read post]
