Search for: "In re Application of Wells" Results 621 - 640 of 22,306
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2011, 8:02 pm by Krystal Wascher
If you tell your story well, this point will be inferred. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 3:56 am
Applicant's advertising touted the advantages of the design and "there appear to be no alternative designs available that would work as well . . . . [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 7:10 am by Tim Sitzmann
  The touch screen can now sense how hard you’re pushing. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Steve Brachmann
We’re taking a really close look at one intriguing patent application published recently by the USPTO that enables a production studio and consumers to earn money off of content sales. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 10:11 am by Jon Gelman
 Medicare, in pursuing recovery directly from the applicable plan, removes the beneficiary, as well as the provider or supplier, as the responsible party to initial a re-determination and all subsequent levels of the administrative process that could culminate in judicial review.Docket ID:CMS-2013-0270Topic(s):Administrative Practices and Procedures, Health Facilities, Health Professions, Kidney Diseases, Medical Devices, Medicare, Reporting and Recordkeeping… [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 1:28 pm by Dennis Crouch
  What we’re typically looking for is the level of skill at the time that the application was filed (or perhaps when issued / amended). [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 12:08 pm
A request for continued examination (RCE) is a fumbling follow-on to the "two strikes and you're out rule" - non-final office action, then final, then to appeal if the examiner has his/her head in nether regions and the applicant is well teed. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 8:02 am
We’re sorry to say, we’re still not hip to Second Life. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 6:45 am by Daniel Schwartz
  Well, that may not be how the saying goes, but the first back-and-forth post between me and Nina Pirrotti, an employee-side attorney, was so well received that we’re back for another conversation. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 4:18 am
" In re Flex Ltd., Serial Nos. 86453853 and 86493735 (December 9, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Michael B. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 3:23 am
" Therefore, the Board found that opposer had failed to adequately plead her non-use claim, and it granted the motion to dismiss.However, the Board allowed applicant twenty days within which to re-plead her non-use claim.Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment: Does opposer have a claim under Section 43(a)? [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 3:39 am by John L. Welch
[Under Judge Seeherman's approach in In re Joint-Stock Company "Baik", 84 USPQ2d 1921 (TTAB 2007) [precedential], this degree of rareness might well result in reversal of the refusal].The second factor was neutral, there being no person having the surname GRISWALD associated with Applicant.The Applicant and the PTO disagreed as to the third factor. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 4:30 am by Karen Tani
Applications to the workshop should consist of a current curriculum vitae (2-3 page maximum), an abstract of a current project not exceeding 700 words, as well as a short (5- page maximum) text relating to that project. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 3:43 am
The identification of goods alone shows that applicant's product is not "gummy. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 3:21 am
In re BCP Home Inc., Serial No. 87202411 (August 13, 2018)[not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Marc A. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 2:58 am by John L. Welch
Moreover, Applicant itself used the term descriptively.The Board found that "applicant as well as others use the term 'eCopy' (as well as 'ecopies') in a non-source-identifying manner. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 4:06 am
” The Board reasoned that “[to] hold to the contrary would lead to the inequitable result that this Applicant, as well as countless other applicants in the creative industries, could not register their marks because the marks identify their characters or the subject matter of the televisions shows. [read post]