Search for: "In re TM"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,029
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2012, 11:03 am
However, that was in response to Ascentive's preliminary injunction motion (when the burden is higher for the TM owner), not on a motion to dismiss. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 6:23 am
East West argued that the introduction of new products bearing the mark in summer 2011 re-triggered the statute of limitations. [read post]
31 May 2012, 7:00 am
We’re just not there yet… today. [read post]
30 May 2012, 7:00 am
If you are a Star Trek fan like me, you’re familiar with James Doohan. [read post]
30 May 2012, 6:20 am
Unless these were commercial uses, they didn’t interfere with LV’s legitimate rights, and not going after them shouldn’t matter at all—it’s offhand comments like this one that lead TM owners to claim they “have” to control any representation of our pervasively branded world, and have the right to do so besides.) [read post]
29 May 2012, 8:08 pm
No, no -- I distinctly said"mediation", not "meditation" While we’re on the subject .... [read post]
29 May 2012, 7:40 am
Since GZ did a police re-enactment the day after the shooting, he may have parked his truck there to show where he had been parked the night before. [read post]
28 May 2012, 1:25 am
Merpel says, whatever else may be said about ™s, they’re not very pretty. [read post]
26 May 2012, 4:31 pm
Here's a little bit of information on trusts that I prepared for the "Preparing for Departure"(TM) seminar that we're giving right now:Trusts and Living Trusts Trusts (and living trusts) are often sold (hard) as an alternative to wills and probate, even for people with modest amounts of property. [read post]
24 May 2012, 11:04 am
Earlier this year, Colloff examined the case for TM in, "Hannah and Andrew. [read post]
23 May 2012, 3:15 pm
(She called the retired DA a "criminal"; I'll bet TM's libel lawyers had a field day vetting that one!) [read post]
10 May 2012, 9:11 am
III courts and reassign to agency, as long as they’re subject to plenary review by a court. [read post]
9 May 2012, 10:20 am
Language of moral outrage—they’re using my name/identity theft. [read post]
9 May 2012, 5:54 am
Genuine product bought in France shipped to the US: under TM, so long as it’s genuine, there’s no TM recourse. [read post]
8 May 2012, 1:34 pm
Some ads are over the line—ambush and TM infringement. [read post]
8 May 2012, 8:43 am
If they’re doing it to you, they’re probably doing it to someone else. [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:06 pm
But we’re already in merchandising-world: Nationals, AU, Capitals T-shirts—these shirts are bought by people who are fans of the teams/schools; they aren’t interested in quality. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 2:42 am
The use of the "TM" symbol by Sones does not necessarily mean that consumers will perceive the phrase as a trademark. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 5:36 am
If you’re communicating “I’m a generic of drug X,” we might have more discomfort offloading that to false advertising but since we have the FDA behind this it’s not troubling. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 2:50 pm
If we’re going to engage with boundaries, we should also engage with the instincts courts have about copying. [read post]
