Search for: "In the Interest of Cp"
Results 621 - 640
of 909
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2011, 9:48 am
The definition would be whether a jury believes a matter to be important, not whether officials at the CPS believe it to be. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 1:53 am
“The Crown Prosecution Service has dropped charges of aggravated trespass against 109 UK Uncut activists who occupied Fortnum & Mason in March, saying they are no longer in the public interest.” Full story The Guardian, 18th July 2011 Source: www.guardian.co.uk [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 1:54 pm
Stars & Stripes has this interesting piece about how it (apparently) may have been engaged, without its knowledge or consent, in hosting CP. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 3:32 pm
The idea that it would be in the best interest of a child to be removed from the family home due to obesity, alone, is outrageous. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 10:10 am
However the CPS guidance quotes "DPP v McKeown, DPP v Jones ([1997] 2Cr App R, 155, HL at page 163) [where] Lord Hoffman defined a computer as "a device for storing, processing and retrieving information". [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 7:44 pm
To read the full article and see the facts regarding other "tort reform" myths click here: http://www.justice.org/cps/rde/xchg/justice/hs.xsl/2011.htm [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 2:46 pm
• Costs of corn production in 2010 were less in 2009 say IL ag economists who studied 1,600 farms with wide ranging soil types. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 4:13 pm
In his effort to protect this information, Zimmerman claimed that his privacy interest outweighed the need to obtain relevant information in discovery. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 5:55 am
However, in the light of the fact that no Missouri case has yet addressed the import of the removal of the words ‘none shall be given’ from Section 577.041, which we believe involves a significant departure from current case law as represented by the Smith case, and the general interest and importance of the issues involved, we transfer the case to the Missouri Supreme Court, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 83.02. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 8:58 am
Yet following the flight of Ben Ali on 14 January 2011, women and their interests were swiftly sidelined. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 8:15 am
Brewer, CP answers my Thirteen Questions today. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 12:55 pm
The CP rule is that all property either spouse receives during marriage is considered jointly owned (with exceptions for gifts and inheritances). [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 5:01 am
The Minister replied that the Government was “monitoring the results” of the police investigation and CPS assessment and would then “consider whether any further action will be necessary”. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:50 am
The decision-making process of the CPS had been flawed. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 4:29 am
But it is interesting to consider the new pressure Dodd-Frank is putting on the problem. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:25 am
CPS failed to follow own guidance on sexual prosecutions. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 6:55 am
Today saw the release, and discussion, of a number of interesting barometers, all purporting to shed light on some of the maladies afflicting Britain. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:57 pm
First Nat’l State Bank of New Jersey, 87 N.J. 163 (1981), the Supreme Court imposed a significant burden of proof upon the advocates of a Will where a presumption of undue influence had arisen because the testator’s attorney placed himself in a conflict of interest and professional loyalty between the testator and the beneficiary. [read post]
26 May 2011, 4:53 am
Topic 431 Adjustments to Income Topic 450 Individual Retirement Arrangements (IRAs) Topic 451 Alimony Paid Topic 452 Bad Debt Deduction Topic 453 Moving Expenses Topic 455 Student Loan Interest Deduction Topic 456 Tuition and Fees Deduction Topic 457 Educator Expense Deduction Topic 458 Itemized Deductions Topic 500 Should I Itemize? [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:42 pm
Of interest, however, the policy itself was never introduced into evidence. [read post]
