Search for: "In the Matter of Amendments to Rules 1 and 10"
Results 621 - 640
of 5,931
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
Labels matter. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 3:09 am
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania recently amended Pennsylvania Rule of Appellate Procedure 2135, which deals with the length of briefs filed with the court. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 8:44 am
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania recently amended Pennsylvania Rule of Appellate Procedure 2135, which deals with the length of briefs filed with the court. [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 11:10 am
(1) The court in such a case could consider whether Congress satisfied the First Amendment within the statute, but no relevant exemptions help here [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 11:50 am
The proxy access rules adopted on August 25, 2010 were proposed on June 10, 2009. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 11:34 am
L. 2004, c. 132, § 10, eff. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 5:53 am
Valeo, 424 U.S. 1, 19 (1976). [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 8:30 am
Previously announced amendments to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s exempt offering rules went into effect on March 15, 2021. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 6:40 am
’ Fed.R.App.P. 46(b)(1)(B). [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 6:56 am
TLMA submitted comments on the proposed rule, arguing that the proposed amendments should not be adopted. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 3:01 pm
It is thus not relevant for Rule 25 EPC 1973 whether or not proceedings are pending before the EPO. [3.2.3] R 25 EPC 1973 implementing A 76 EPC 1973 has been amended several times. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
It is worth noting that a recent ruling from the Virginia Supreme Court suggests that First Amendment protections may outweigh an attorney’s duty to withhold non-confidential client information in the context of blogging about closed cases that are already a matter of public record. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 11:50 pm
Recall that the traditional Fourth Amendment rule was that the police could always watch a suspect in public (no search), but that they could not enter protected spaces without a warrant or some Fourth Amendment oversight (a search). [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
In response to the District's informing retirees that it would no longer reimburse them for IRMAA surcharges, certain retirees [Plaintiffs] commenced a CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking [1] a court order annulling the District's decision, contending that the District's discontinuing such reimbursements violated Chapter 729 of the Laws of 1994 (as amended by Chapter 22 of the Laws of 2007), the State's Retiree Health Insurance Moratorium Act [Act]* and [2] a… [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
In response to the District's informing retirees that it would no longer reimburse them for IRMAA surcharges, certain retirees [Plaintiffs] commenced a CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking [1] a court order annulling the District's decision, contending that the District's discontinuing such reimbursements violated Chapter 729 of the Laws of 1994 (as amended by Chapter 22 of the Laws of 2007), the State's Retiree Health Insurance Moratorium Act [Act]* and [2] a… [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 2:38 pm
Prepare To Meet Broadened Requirements Following its publication in the March 24, Federal Register, the persuader rule is scheduled to take effect on April 25, 2016 and apply to arrangements, agreements, and payments made on or after July 1, 2016. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 6:14 pm
Reg. 73/20, Limitation periods 1. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 8:36 pm
This act shall take effect July 1, 2022. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 1:29 pm
On October 10, 2023, California Governor Newsom signed into law S.B. 365, a bill that amends California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1294. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 5:58 am
The agenda identifies the regulatory matters the CFPB “reasonably anticipates” having under consideration during the period from May 1, 2013 to May 1, 2014. [read post]
