Search for: "In the Matter of Amendments to Rules 1 and 10"
Results 621 - 640
of 5,428
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
Three hour rule and scheduling provision in force January 1, 2019 Bill 47 amends Part VII.1 and 2 that provides that employees are entitled to a minimum of three hours’ pay for shifts that are under three hours, except in certain circumstances. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 5:53 am
There are three levels of scrutiny: (1) strict scrutiny, (2) intermediate scrutiny, and (3) rational basis. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 12:41 pm
This provision violated the NLRA and was invalid as a matter of law, the court held. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 5:04 am
The rule of lenity says that the court must, as a matter of due process, interpret statutes in a way that lenient towards the defendant. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm
The Board then stated:[4] In summary, the board finds that claim 1 of both requests relates to the technical implementation of excluded matter in the form of game rules. [read post]
8 May 2007, 10:31 am
The District government had sought reconsideration following a Circuit panel's 2-1 ruling on March 9 that held the Second Amendment protects an individual right to have a handgun in one's own home. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
Chapter Readings· United Nations Rule of Law, “What is the Rule of Law”[1]· Norhiro Urabe, “Rule of Law and Due Process: A Comparative View of the United States and Japan,”[2]Law and Contemporary Problems 53(1):61-72 (1990)· David Clark, “The Many Meanings of the Rule of… [read post]
6 May 2021, 7:15 am
Whether it is appropriate for a court to dismiss a complaint (and thus invalidate all asserted patents) using Rule 12(b)(6) without amendment to the complaint or oral argument by making factual findings and rejecting the plaintiff ’s detailed factual assertions inconsistent with Bell Atl. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 6:47 am
The Lawyer You Hire Really Does Matter. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 11:37 pm
Sept. 10, 2008). [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 7:18 am
October 10 will be Hamer Time at the Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 7:22 am
Id. at 10. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 2:30 am
In 1967, the Court heard oral arguments, and on June 10, 1968, an 8-1 majority ruled in favor of the state of Ohio. [read post]
24 Feb 2025, 9:05 pm
Revised Section 144(a) thus is largely a clarifying amendment. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
As established in the case law of the boards of appeal, as a matter of principle, the EPC foresees the absolute right to OPs under A 116(1) EPC 1973, but not the right to a telephone interview (cf. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 2:56 pm
On Thursday, the Supreme Court in a 5-4 decision ruled in Stern v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 9:18 am
The proposed amendment will not, in any way, alter Petitioner’s legal arguments already presented in this matter. [read post]
24 May 2016, 5:56 pm
Such an amendment would typically not raise the issue of new matter, even when the specification is silent . . . [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 6:38 am
Kirkland's attorneys' fees in these matters totaled $162 million. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 12:42 pm
The Court ruled that federal courts had “subject matter jurisdiction” over questions of apportionment under the 14th Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause, separate from Article IV, Section IV or the “guarantee clause” of the Constitution. [read post]
