Search for: "JANE DOES 1-2" Results 621 - 640 of 990
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2009, 4:15 am
I believe that most people in America want four things from their government:1. [read post]
4 May 2012, 10:23 am by Irene C. Olszewski, Esq.
The audiobook will be available on CD and for digital download on June 1 through all major retailers, including iTunes and Amazon. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 11:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Affiliated Ute Does Not Apply to Claims Based Primarily on Misstatements The Second Circuit agreed with defendants that the district court should not have given plaintiffs the benefit of the Affiliated Ute Adhering to two of its prior decisions, the court held that Affiliated Ute does not apply to claims based “primarily” on affirmative misstatements, as opposed to omissions.[6] The court noted that the alleged omissions were “simply the inverse” of the… [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 1:28 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The Ninth Circuit’s Opinion On September 21, 2021, the Ninth Circuit, in a 2-1 opinion written by Judge Jane A. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
The fees represent most of his annual income.[2] Heller started a class proceeding against Uber in 2017 for violations of the Employment Standards Act.[3] Uber brought a motion to stay the class proceeding in favour of arbitration in the Netherlands. [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 5:35 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Reg. 73/70) under the Act on March 20, 2020, as follows: 1. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 5:16 am by Eugene Volokh
Plaintiff alleges that, in December of 2021, he was distributing literature at the University of Missouri-Columbia (MU) and was asked by a Jane Doe who identified herself as "with operations" to relocate to another location on campus. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm by Venkat
I wonder whether the result would have been different if the lawyer in question sent a friend request that expressly addressed the ex parte issue--e.g., "I'm John Doe, counsel for Jane Doe, and I'd like to speak with you about this matter. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 6:34 am by admin
  Yet standing between the redevelopers and their visions of sugar-condos are the lichen-like economic cryptobiotica of small businesses, who are annoyingly stubborn when it comes to protecting what they see as their property rights, as profiled in No more ‘blight blanket’ eminent domain: Part 1, does this look like blight to you? [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 7:39 am by Aaron Rubin and Charles Cartagena-Ortiz
The court rejected this argument, reasoning that claims based on the “structure and operation” of an interactive computer service were barred by Section 230 because the lack of safety features reflects “choices about what content can appear on the website and in what form, which are editorial choices,” citing the First Circuit’s decision in Jane Doe No. 1 v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 6:13 am by Joy Waltemath
Subsequently, the employer filed suit in state court against two building residents, Internet service providers, 20 anonymous John and Jane Does, and three former employees. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 4:40 am by Terry Hart
1 She observes that many cloud services are “dual purpose. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:36 am by INFORRM
There were also several resolved complaints, including: Mr Charles Tubbs v Daily Mail, No clause specified, 29/04/2013; Dr John Little v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 26/04/2013; Mrs Deborah Farrell v That’s Life, Clause 1, 25/04/2012; Jessica Westwood v The Mail on Sunday, Clause 1, 25/04/2013; Neil Turner v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 25/04/2013; Ms Judy Gibbons v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 25/04/2013; A woman v Daily Mail, Clause 1,… [read post]