Search for: "JD v. State" Results 621 - 640 of 920
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2013, 1:43 pm by WIMS
Jun 13: In the case of Tarrant Regional Water District. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 1:53 pm by Daniel Pollack
Code § 67:V.7315; Mississippi DHS/DFCS Policy, http://www.mdhs.state.ms.us/pdfs/fcspolicy/sectionf.pdf 4 http://www.dfps.state.tx.us/Adoption_and_Foster_Care/About_TARE/Foster_Care/homestudy_guidelines.asp Daniel Pollack MSSA (MSW), JD Professor, Wurzweiler School of Social Work, Yeshiva University, New York City, and a frequent expert witness in child welfare cases. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 1:53 pm by Daniel Pollack
Code § 67:V.7315; Mississippi DHS/DFCS Policy, http://www.mdhs.state.ms.us/pdfs/fcspolicy/sectionf.pdf 4 http://www.dfps.state.tx.us/Adoption_and_Foster_Care/About_TARE/Foster_Care/homestudy_guidelines.asp Daniel Pollack MSSA (MSW), JD Professor, Wurzweiler School of Social Work, Yeshiva University, New York City, and a frequent expert witness in child welfare cases. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 1:46 pm by WIMS
Access THE QB-Lu research paper on CFC v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 1:25 pm by WIMS
Circuit, Case No. 11-1302, EME Homer City Generation, L.P v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 1:52 am by Daniel Richardson
Lead counsel for DOJ’s investigation of Microsoft, he was primary career counsel in the trial of U.S. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 12:43 pm by WIMS
See Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 24–27. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 11:59 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s decision in National Australia Bank v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 12:00 am
v=M3JtBUgiji4Third-year Washington University School of Law student Joe Franklin discusses his interests in IP law and his experiences in the D.C. clinical education program. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 10:34 pm by Jeff Richardson
  On Wednesday, Apple and others filed a brief opposing the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 1:15 pm by WIMS
APPS goes further and specifically applies the provisions of Annex V to U.S. navigable waters as well as all other waters and vessels over which the United States has jurisdiction, including U.S. vessels in U.S. internal waters. [read post]