Search for: "JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC" Results 621 - 640 of 861
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2011, 11:27 am by Aaref Hilaly
In product development, we have always sought to build our enterprise products as if they were consumer products, so we made sure that they are intuitive and easy to use without any training. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 4:00 am by Susan Cartier Liebel
Lurie Daniel-Favors is a consumer rights and bankruptcy attorney in New York. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 3:03 pm by Chad W. Johnson
 For more information regarding the Colorado Consumer Protection Act, contact Chad Johnson at johnson@hhmrlaw.com or by telephone at (303) 987-9870. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
Robins Co., 738 P.2d 1210, 1227-28 (Kan. 1987) (applied to medical device); Johnson v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 1:35 pm
It wasn't that long ago that DePuy Orthopedics Inc., a division of Johnson and Johnson, had hip replacement products recalled. [read post]
31 May 2011, 2:16 am by Cal Warriner
(who is part of Johnson & Johnson Medical Devices & Diagnostics), and Zimmer, Inc., due to the adverse affects of metal-on-metal implants. [read post]
20 May 2011, 9:02 am by Amy Keller, Associate
Spudnuts, Inc., 735 F.2d 763, 765 (3d Cir. 1984) (holding that the language “venue for any proceeding . . . shall be Salt Lake County, State of Utah,” constituted a mandatory forum selection clause); Milk N’ More, Inc. v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 7:32 am
Henry Johnson (D-Ga.) introduced the Arbitration Fairness Act of 2011 (H.R. 1873). [read post]
5 May 2011, 5:23 pm by AALRR
  The day the decision came down, United States Senators Al Franken (D-Minn.), (of  Saturday Night Live fame) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), and Representative Hank Johnson (D-Ga.) announced they will introduce legislation called the "Arbitration Fairness Act," which would eliminate "forced arbitration clauses in employment, consumer, and civil rights cases. . . . [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
  Thus, the Toner decision consistently seems to go out of its way to make the comment k defense as costly and time consuming as possible.As for negligence, while the Toner court held that comment k did not “literally” apply (it being a comment to strict liability), the same general principles were the same in negligence law:In a general sense, however, the comment k concerns and its required balancing between risks and benefits are similar to those involved in a negligence… [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 7:47 pm by Kevin Funnell
Suthers’ office reached a consent decree with Jerry Johnson, who was also involved with the business, shortly before trial that also forced him to pay $1 million in fines and stops him from issuing loans. [read post]