Search for: "Jed S. Rakoff"
Results 621 - 640
of 787
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2012, 2:57 pm
Earlier this month, Judge Jed Rakoff of the Southern District of New York preliminarily enjoined Clorox from airing a commercial claiming that carbon used in its Fresh Step cat litter was more effective at absorbing odors than the baking soda (which happens to be the active ingredient in Church & Dwight’s cat litter, although C&D products are not mentioned in the ad). [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 7:27 am
Less than a month later, Judge Jed Rakoff entered a $92 million civil judgment against Mr. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 10:36 am
District Court Judge Jed Rakoff sentenced Monster Worldwide, Inc.'s chief financial officer to two years in jail for improperly accounting for backdated stock options, which earned him $14.5 million, rejecting his attorney's proposal for no prison time for a "technical" crime that the judge regarded as "appalling. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 4:50 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit overturned an order from Judge Jed Rakoff, of Federal District Court in Manhattan, that would have compelled Mr. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 9:31 am
District Judge Jed S. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 1:36 pm
District Court Judge Jed S. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 9:30 pm
Jed S. [read post]
16 May 2008, 2:15 pm
District Judge Jed Rakoff disagreed, noting that the American Red Cross had used the emblem for more than a century and was authorized to do so by various Geneva Conventions and the U.S. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 6:11 pm
The claims against NASDAQ ultimately were consolidated before Southern District of New York Judge Jed Rakoff. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 5:29 am
District Judge Jed Rakoff’s decision to reject the agency’s $285 million settlement with Citigroup. (11-5227) Wednesday, Jan. 18 • The Supreme Court will hear arguments in Holder v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 3:43 am
Here are some of the latest entries: - Judge Jed Rakoff's Profile Piece - New Shareholder Initiative Seeking Disclosure of Lobbying - A Final Review of 2011 E&S Shareholder Proposals - Calculating Your Deadlines: A Nifty Tool - Gaming Warren Buffett's Annual Shareholders Meeting - Corp Fin's 2012 Shareholder Proposal Task Force - Elimination of Broker Voting: Ineffective Regulation by the SEC? [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 2:43 pm
District Judge Jed S. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 5:15 am
District Judge Jed Rakoff in Manhattan is expected to issue an order on whether Madoff trustee Irving Picard’s lawsuit against the owners of the New York Mets can go to trial. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 9:57 am
District Judge Jed Rakoff (sitting by designation), observed that Apuzzo’s proximate cause construction of substantial assistance “ignores the difference between an SEC enforcement action and a private suit for damages. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 6:30 am
For starters, New York federal judge Jed Rakoff tossed out a proposed settlement between the SEC and Bank of America over bonuses paid to executives at Merrill Lynch shortly after BofA took over Merrill. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 8:37 pm
Rakoff sentenced Mr. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 10:46 am
Recently, US District Judge Jed Rakoff, who rejected the SEC’s proposed $285 million securities settlement with Citigroup, questioned a system that allows wrongdoers to pay a fine, as well as other penalties, without having to admit or deny wrongdoing. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 7:56 am
District Court Judge Jed Rakoff has issued a controversial ruling denying the “server test” of copyright law and ruling that embedding images can be an infringement of copyright law. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 1:37 pm
David has a JD from Yale and is currently an associate at Jenner. - David has a beautiful clerkship three-layer-cake: Judge Jed Rakoff of the Federal District Court, Judge Robert Katzmann of the Second Circuit, and, next July, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg of the Supreme Court! [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 4:41 pm
Sullivan and later cases shouldn't apply, and Judge Jed Rakoff said nay to that: Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment presents a pure question of law: whether plaintiff is required to prove that the allegedly libelous statements at issue in this case were published with "actual malice. [read post]
