Search for: "John Doe A,B,C and D" Results 621 - 640 of 1,366
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2016, 10:40 am by Eugene Volokh
Is it your testimony that when John walked into your office on October 8, 2014, you had essentially prejudged his case before you even spoke to him? [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 7:34 am
It will also not cover people residing in Jammu & Kashmir.Problem areas in the Aadhaar BillThe Aadhaar Bill is flawed, fundamentally, in several ways.1) Lack of uniformity of purpose of Aadhaar: The Aadhaar Bill does not contain a Preamble. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 2:40 pm by familoo
It was said to b a compilation of the details of “29 children in 13 families who were killed…as a result of contact (and in one case residence) arrangements”. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 7:16 am
John with the Leavenworth Police Department testified he created a photo lineup that included pictures of Gauger and five other individuals with similar characteristics. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 5:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  We ask “is this IP right invalid b/c it’s too broad” and “is the thing D is doing sufficiently similar to what P is doing” but generally not in an integrated proceeding “is the thing D is doing that P is doing the thing that can be controlled under this right? [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
 And finally Eleonora updated on the CJEU's decision in Case C-279/13 C More Entertainment where the CJEU said that live broadcasts are not communication to the public within InfoSoc Directive, but Member States can protect them: "[The Information Society] [D]irective provides that broadcasting organizations may prohibit the provision to the public fixations of their broadcasts [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
  Here’s how they work together:Comment b following §908 further states that “[r]eckless indifference to the rights of others and conscious action in deliberate disregard of them (see §500) may provide the necessary state of mind to justify punitive damages. [read post]