Search for: "Johnson v. House" Results 621 - 640 of 1,527
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2008, 11:32 am
Judge Price filed a dissenting opinion joined by Judges Meyers, Johnson, and Holcomb. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 1:27 am by Joshua Matz
January 10, 2024 Speaker Mike Johnson H-232 The Capitol Washington, D.C. 20515 Chairman Mark Green 2446 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 Constitutional Law Experts on the Impeachment ProceedingsAgainst Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas Senior Republicans in the House of Representatives—including Speaker of the House Mike Johnson and Chairman Mark Green of the Committee on Homeland Security—have stated that… [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
The House of Lords Communications and Digital Committee’s report on Large Language Models has concluded it is not “fair for tech firms to use rightsholder data for commercial purposes without permission or compensation, and to gain vast financial rewards in the process”. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 5:04 pm by Marie Louise
Teva and ratiopharm (EPLAW) Fentanyl – Germany: Federal Court of Justice: Lessons to be learned for claim construction and novelty: Xa ZR 149/07 (Kluwer Patent Blog) Finasteride – France: Tribunale de Grande Instance de Paris: Murder me twice – Merck’s dosage regime patent held invalid again: Teva v Merck Sharp & Dohme (EPLAW) Gaviscon (Sodium alginate, Sodium bicarbonate, Calcium carbonate) – UK: Reckitt Benckiser fined £10.2 M for halting supply of… [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 pm by Kent Scheidegger
"Yet in Johnson, Justice Scalia, who joined Salerno, wrote the opinion for the Court throwing out this clause entirely, even though there are circumstance where it would clearly apply. [read post]
As former Justice Benjamin Curtis, who dissented in Dred Scott v. [read post]
15 Oct 2016, 12:38 pm
It began its analysis of this issue by explaining that theFourth Amendment provides that `[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 3:43 am by Amy Howe
” At casetext, Leah Litman argues “that the Supreme Court should exercise its discretion to weigh in on whether it has made” its decision in Johnson v. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 12:51 pm
An in-house attorney for the DEA commented that the plaintiff's involvement in the audit process was a conflict of interest due to her participation in the Segar case. [read post]