Search for: "Johnson v. West" Results 621 - 640 of 720
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2009, 7:44 am by Roshonda Scipio
TITLE Samuel Johnson : the struggle / Jeffrey Meyers. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
: Kelly and another v GE Healthcare Ltd (IP finance) (Mis)appropriation of Wii and PlayStation brands to name medical disorders (IPKat) Is regulation of trade mark attorneys necessary? [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 10:05 am
Since even the Dukes panel had been uncomfortable with the class action-punitive damages issue, we could have the outliers whittled down to one, that being the West Virginia Supreme Court's ducking the issue in State v. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 9:00 pm
That would make mass torts less massive and all litigation easier to defend.And, of course, if the law barred DTC advertising for two years, we could explain to juries that the law requires not just FDA approval of a new drug, but also an intentionally slow introduction to the market to help protect public safety, even if that slow introduction reduces corporate profits.So we're of two minds on this issue.But we can't stop there: Remember the decision in West Virginia ex rel… [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
(The Prior Art) Ways to avoid a USPTO ethics investigation (IP Updates)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Qualcomm penalised for failure to disclose patents to standard setting organisation and for litigation misconduct in failing to produce evidence: Qualcomm Inc v Broadcom Corp (IP Law Observer) (Patently-O) (Promote the Progress) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) (PLI) CAFC upholds judgment enjoining inventor from asserting patent against Unitronics or its… [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 2:52 pm
Sajar Plastics[7th Cir.]o 7th Defines Who Is A Supervisor Under Title VIIAndonissany v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 5:00 am
In June 2007, the West Virginia Supreme Court refused to adopt the learned intermediary doctrine.We deplored State of West Virginia ex rel Johnson & Johnson Corp. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 7:43 pm
Strine notes that Unocal’s board met for eight or nine hours to consider Pickens’ offer — a response to Smith v. [read post]